News location:

Canberra Today 13°/15° | Wednesday, November 29, 2023 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

This race-based constitution change divides us 

Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price with ACT Deputy Opposition Leader Jeremy Hanson.

“I fear entrenching a separate, unelected Voice in the constitution would diminish the power of those elected members and the people they represent,” says JEREMY HANSON

ON principal, I believe we shouldn’t change the constitution to entrench any racially based entity that treats one group of Australians differently to other Australians.  

As a nation, we have worked tirelessly to treat every individual equally, regardless of race, colour or creed. 

I do not support something I consider to be taking Australia backwards by institutionalising racial division in our founding document.

We are all Australian and each of us has a voice that represents all of us equally, it is the Australian Parliament. 

There are currently 11 indigenous federal members, which proportionally outnumbers non-indigenous parliamentarians. This is something I celebrate, and I fear entrenching a separate, unelected Voice in the constitution would diminish the power of those elected members and the people they represent.  

The solutions to the undeniable disadvantage faced by some, but certainly not all, indigenous Australians are in my view not to be found by creating race-based constitutional division.

The Voice is already creating division across Australia and, in particular, amongst indigenous Australians. On Australia Day in Canberra, representatives of the Tent Embassy led protests against the Voice. Indigenous senator Lidia Thorpe resigned as a member of the Greens because of her opposition to the Voice and Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price from Alice Springs is also campaigning strongly against it. 

Indigenous Australians in remote Australia have disputed the idea that their very diverse communities can be represented by a group of appointed people as a single voice.  

Jacinta Price, who is married to an Australian of Scottish descent, has described to me how the Voice is something that risks division between families and within marriages. 

This is not just a debate about the principle. This would be a deeply significant change to the constitution, and the inclusion of “executive government” in the Voice risks an ongoing legal quagmire of High Court challenges. Beyond its potential legal powers, the Voice will also wield significant political power.  

The prime minister has admitted that only a “very brave government” would disagree with the Voice on certain policy issues. I believe that no group of unelected Australians should ever wield such legal and political power.

It concerns me that the prime minister has refused to provide sufficient detail about the Voice or release the solicitor-general’s advice and the referendum has been set up to limit debate.  

Both sides of the debate won’t be funded as was the case for the republic referendum, and in an overt act of undemocratic bias, initially any donations to the “yes” case tax were deductible but not for the “no” case. This has eroded trust not just in the Voice but in the whole fairness of the referendum process.

The refusal to create a Voice by legislation before demanding a referendum is generating distrust about why a referendum is being pursued.  

My suspicion is that the Voice is being presented as some utopian panacea, to solve the great disadvantage faced by indigenous Australians, but will not actually progress closing the gap.  

It is hard for me to see how yet another advisory body on the back of other failed models, such as ATSIC, will make any real difference.  

A logical and less divisive way forward has been proposed by the federal opposition, which would provide recognition for indigenous Australians in the constitution and establish regional and local voices through an act in parliament. I support this approach.

I believe we should all commit to work together to respond to our indigenous peoples with recognition and with legislation but not allow a race-based change to the constitution to divide us.

MLA Jeremy Hanson is the deputy leader of the ACT opposition and was, among other portfolios, Liberal spokesperson for indigenous affairs (2008-2012).

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Share this

5 Responses to This race-based constitution change divides us 

ACT Resident says: 17 April 2023 at 2:48 pm

The Canberra Liberals under leader Elizabeth Lee have cowardly stopped short of expressing support for our Indigenous population and their Voice to Parliament.
The decision not to support the Voice puts the party out of step with ACT voters. It also puts the party out of step with their
State colleagues who have all signed on to the proposal.
This opinion piece from now acting leader Jeremy Hanson clearly sets out the Canberra Liberals’ position on the Voice and why the party is on their way out!

Hamba says: 18 April 2023 at 3:32 pm

‘Our Indigenous population’ in the ACT has a wide range of views on the referendum, from strong support to strong opposition. A few weeks ago, I asked a couple of elderly Ngunnawal friends what they thought. One of them responded, ‘I don’t need fancy people pretending to speak for me. You can hear MY voice already!’

Dom says: 17 April 2023 at 8:59 pm

The ACT Liberal Party are locking themselves into another 4 years in opposition very early his election cycle. They might manage to have fewer seats than the Greens if they keep up this rhetoric.

Daz says: 18 April 2023 at 4:43 pm

Well said Jeremy, good to see some Liberals with a backbone who are willing to push back against this racist referendum. We are all Australians and we should all be treated equally. The ‘Indigenous Voice to Parliament’ will wreck our Constitution, rewire our democracy, and divide Australians by race. It’s divisive, it’s dangerous, it’s expensive and it’s not fair.

Adrian L Rumsey says: 19 April 2023 at 11:28 am

Well done Jeremy and Jacinta. I find it hard to understand how anyone can support altering our constitution to enshrine forever a dividion between Australians on racial grounds. Whilst non-indigenous Australians have enjoyed migrating to a beautiful country previously inhabited by indigenous Australians, they brought with them the trappings of modern life such as a sustainable food and water supply, medicine, education, housing, transport and a system of justice that gives equality to men and women. They also fought to protect the country from invasion by others who might well have been less sympathetic to indigenous people.


Leave a Reply

Related Posts


The presumption of innocence is dead and buried

Legal affairs writer and former barrister HUGH SELBY says the presumption of innocence is dead and buried. It has been inverted. It is now a presumption of guilt unless and until a court finds the accused "not guilty".

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews