News location:

Tuesday, November 5, 2024 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Putting the seven o’clock news in its place

British astrophysicist Jo Dunkley… has explored the milli-seconds after the Big Bang. Photo: Suki Dhanda

“Like other TV news programs, its producers are obsessed with the vile, the criminal and the foolish things men do, but they censor themselves in their reportage and thereby ‘normalise’ such behaviour,” writes ROBERT MACKLIN in his 350th Gadfly column. 

I turned off the seven o’clock news in disgust during the headlines. Finally, I’d had enough. 

Since I spend my days at the computer, any breaking news arrives via the daily and weekly CityNews supplemented occasionally by the digital New York Times. 

The weekend intake is a different matter – it features the sheer joy of the ABC’s Landline, and especially the New Scientist magazine. They do what the other news outlets singley fail to do – they tell, respectively, the optimistic story of Australian ingenuity, and our exciting human progress.

I will return to their virtues shortly, but that’s not the main reason for my rejection of the traditional ABC television news. The sad truth is that the national broadcaster is caught in a paradox of its own making. 

Like other TV news programs, its producers are obsessed with the vile, the criminal and the foolish things men do, but they censor themselves in their reportage and thereby “normalise” such behaviour. 

This is blindingly obvious in their coverage of the wars that begin every bulletin. 

In Gaza, for example, some 40,000 people, including at least 12,000 children, have been torn to pieces or buried alive by the bombs supplied by America and deployed by Israel. Yet our TV reports only ever show the surrounds of a fuzzed-out “casualty” or a reassembled one in a neat package of white sheets ready for burial.

The anonymous perpetrators are never shown in their aircraft taking aim and releasing the deadly bombs or missiles. They are not even called the Israelis. Instead, it’s the anodyne “IDF” with a neat, uniformed spokesman explaining that the enemy – a “terrorist” so-designated by our own government – was hiding beneath the hospital or school or apartment block they demolished. 

It’s not that I want to revel in the horror pictures of death and destruction. On the contrary, I abhor the entire, execrable activity. But for that very reason, neither do I want war – the ultimate human obscenity – to be airbrushed by the censors. 

The reason is simple. If we were exposed to the reality, the vile mass murder of children in all its bloody horror, we would rise as one and demand it immediately ceases.

However, turn the coin, and in wonderful contrast, the latest Landline features great stories beginning with the explosion of new brussel sprouts varieties grown in South Australia. They are changing our vegetable diet across the country. 

Then comes the revival of the vast native oyster colony in the waters of Eyre Peninsula after its destruction over a century from 1840. That’s followed by the transformation of the lupin flower crop of northern Victoria into a breakfast cereal of such nutritional value (and good taste) that dieticians report great results from Australia’s aged care residents. And finally, a French and Australian couple are joyously raising their two little girls on a 215,000-hectare conservation property on the Queensland edge of the Simpson Desert.

The current New Scientist discovers multitudes of both benign and threatening microbes in the human brain. It carries an Australian peer-reviewed analysis revealing that the Wuhan market of wild animals really did cause the COVID-19 epidemic (so much for Scomo’s racist fantasies and the millions lost in the barley, wine and lobster exports to China). 

But my favourite is the interview with British astrophysicist Jo Dunkley who has not only explored the milli-seconds after the Big Bang, she is also headed to the imminent opening of the Simons Observatory in Chile. And with a little luck, that will lead to a vision of what went before! 

Puts the seven o’clock news in its place, doesn’t it?

robert@robertmacklin.com 

 

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Robert Macklin

Robert Macklin

Share this

2 Responses to Putting the seven o’clock news in its place

cbrapsycho says: 24 October 2024 at 9:14 am

Agree totally!!!!! Landline is my favourite show on tv aside from some of the comedy shows. Uplifting all of them. There is so much happening in our land that is inspiring, innovative and increasingly sustainable as farmers seek to improve their land along with their output. Not just young farmers either as we hear of those who’ve been doing this for decades and we see the results.

Sadly, I couldn’t keep up with New Scientist, never getting the time to read it all so stopped buying it regularly. Scientific American was less dense, but quite narrow.

All television ‘news’ is disgracefully crafted as it avoids the real issues and is not honest, especially with regard to Israel. Dozens of innocent civilians are so frequently killed with the IDF claiming that they got a Hamas operative or a Hezbollah person, as if that were true (no evidence demonstrated) and even if it were, it doesn’t justify the killing of many innocents. Israel is acting with impunity as the rest of the world looks on doing nothing about it. The ABC has become so afraid of criticism from the right and from Zionist groups that it’s bowing to their wishes, obliterating the facts by sanitising or removing essential information. The only way I can learn what’s really happening is to go online, searching many different publications to get more perspectives than what is offered to us.

I don’t understand why we continually get the Zionist view of Israel and Palestine, rather than the more humanitarian view of the many Jews and others who have opposed Israel’s routine humiliation and abuse of the Palestinians including their dispossession and destruction of their homes to give to Jews. This is what was done to Jews in WWII and we saw this as wrong, so why is it not wrong when done by Jews to Palestinians?

Very disappointed with the ABC and with most of journalism, as it panders to the powerful and ignores the issues that really matter.

Reply
David says: 26 October 2024 at 8:30 am

I agree, as mentioned in Mark Kenny’s article comments, the ABC is no longer the unbiased delivery on news to the taxpayer, who pays for it, by a focused mouth piece for a certain wing of the powerful. Calling it “ABC News” is deceitful, “ABC Opinions” would be better.

We have reached a strange point in how we judge deplorable actions from the past. Victims from the past can use such actions from the past to justify deplorable actions in the current day. They cannot be questioned because to do so is somehow denying or belittling what happened in the past. At the same time, people who act completely differently to their ancestors are still judged by the actions of their ancestors. Maybe King Charles should have arrived in a battle cruiser and taken out a few hospitals and schools as he is going to be judged to be that kind of person whatever he does. Maybe that’s what he needed to do to get the government to thwart Thorpes’ use of free speech?

Reply

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Opinion

Sow hatred today and the blooms of death will follow

In this column HUGH SELBY sets a warring scene of history, with a focus on the Middle East, then follows with a sobering generic warning that looks at the seeds of ethnic and religious hatred and what mankind may harvest in the future. 

Letters

‘Antiseptic’ news reports belie the truth of war

"It would not be inappropriate to sanction the Israelis together with their global aiders and abettors who, speaking of concern for the distress they create, willingly supply their weapons of mass destruction," says JOHN MURRAY, of Fadden.

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews