News location:

Tuesday, October 13, 2026 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Big ideas to fix housing left untouched at roundtable

The federal government has announced reforms aimed at making housing more affordable. (Joel Carrett/AAP PHOTOS)

By Rachel Jackson in Canberra

Australia’s productivity roundtable has produced some useful housing ideas but they will do little to increase affordability, economists say.

Wrapping up the government’s three-day summit, Treasurer Jim Chalmers announced a suite of reforms aimed at making the market more affordable.

They include reducing complexity and red tape in the national construction code, making it easier for developers to build new homes.

Trimming the regulatory thicket would cut the cost of a new house by about $10,000, chief economist for the Centre for Independent Studies Peter Tulip said.

The median house price in Sydney is about $1.7 million.

“These announcements will be welcomed by almost everyone in the construction industry,” Mr Tulip told AAP.

“But it’s not the biggest problem we face in that housing market, and it’s not the biggest restriction to worry about.”

The roundtable failed to address the restrictions imposed on housing supply through zoning and planning, Mr Tulip said.

Leaked Treasury advice warned that the government’s goal of building 1.2 million new homes in five years was not on track to be met.

Mr Tulip argued incentives needed to be brought forward for state and territory governments to reach their housing targets, who face strong opposition from locals against nearby development.

Under the federal government’s new homes bonus, states and territories that meet their housing targets receive a share of a $3 billion fund, but the bonus is not payable until after the five-year period.

Bringing the payments forward would increase incentives for decision makers at no extra cost to the Commonwealth, Mr Tulip said.

“You’ve got people in state and local governments making very difficult, controversial decisions now facing lots of opposition, and they won’t be around in five years’ time to get this payment,” he said.

Pausing the national construction code was supported by states during the roundtable discussions, NSW Treasurer Daniel Mookhey said.

“Anything that is impeding us from converting approvals to homes needs to go,” he said.

The NSW government put $5 million aside in the 2024 state budget to rollout artificial intelligence planning approvals, the treasurer said.

“We’ve already seen how that is helping us make some better decisions,” he said.

“We think there’s good examples of how those lessons can be spread across the nation.”

The first step towards reform is one of the hardest things for state and territory governments to undertake, Business Council of Australia chief executive Bran Black said after the roundtable.

He pointed to strategies used by states including up-zoning of developments around key transport nodes in Victoria.

“If you could take a suite of those things that are already done in one state and say, let’s make this the norm across the federation, that will make a huge difference,” Mr Black said.

What’s this week told us about reform under Albanese?

News all day, every day at CityNews.com.au.

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Australian Associated Press

Australian Associated Press

Share this

One Response to Big ideas to fix housing left untouched at roundtable

David says: 23 August 2025 at 11:57 am

The problem isn’t identifying what needs to be done, it’s finding people willing to make the change.

The problem is housing affordability for people who do not own a home. These are not people without jobs expecting a house to be provided at everyone else’s expense. Their problem is housing is too expensive and, in most cases, they are throwing money away on rent for no progress towards owning a home. If you cannot make houses cheaper then you have to minimize the amount of money spent on rent. Collecting rent money from these people while denying them a place to own and live in should be effectively seen as a criminal activity. The system needs to change to prioritize people looking to own a home over people blocking these people from owning a home and collecting rent from them. From a government’s perspective it is money for nothing. You’re just converting people’s rent money into home ownership which has many pluses, including decreasing the welfare burden (and we are facing a massive welfare burden in the coming decades).

As for making houses cheaper, it is simply not going to happen through building more houses. History tells us this, especially the last few years. Builders already struggle to build houses at current prices and streamlining the system is just going to create poorer build quality. In 5 to 10 years time the news will be dominated by stories of homes built in the last few years falling apart. No builder in their right mind in going to build a house equivalent to a current house at a lower price. We’re not talking about building a lot more houses at a cheaper price, we’re talking about building cheap and nasty housing.

The solution is, minimize demand to allow the system to catchup (and avoid building cheap nasty housing that will become problem in the near future), prioritize owner occupier’s, and minimize rental payments converting that money into long term financial stability, thereby minimizing the welfare burden (allowing welfare to be targeted to those who really need it).

Interesting debate on a bedroom tax. Yes we should have a tax with an increase rate per bedroom. Each additional bedroom is taxed at a higher right. Then, taking the view that these bedrooms and being withheld from people who want to owner occupy, it should be applied across all the bedrooms someone owns, including all their investment properties.

It’s not just about putting roofs over peoples heads, it’s about getting them to own those roofs during their working lives.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*

Related Posts

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews