News location:

Tuesday, October 13, 2026 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Keep electric car tax cut, remove pollution instead

The Electric Vehicle Council released findings on the impact of a tax exemption for electric cars. (Jono Searle/AAP PHOTOS)

By Jennifer Dudley-Nicholson in Brisbane

Extending a tax cut for electric cars until 2035 could put another 1.5 million motorists behind the wheel of a low-emissions vehicle and significantly cut transport pollution, a study has found.

The government could also fuel the supply of second-hand low-emission cars by bringing plug-in hybrid electric vehicles back into the scheme.

The Electric Vehicle Council released the findings on Monday in financial modelling exploring the impact of the fringe-benefits tax exemption for electric cars.

The modelling comes after the Productivity Commission called on the federal government to scrap the tax break, calling it a duplicative and expensive policy.

It also follows national debate over the introduction of a road-user tax to be levied on electric vehicle drivers, and after several states, including NSW, Victoria and Queensland, removed rebates for their purchase.

The research, prepared by Magenta Advisory, investigated the fringe-benefits tax exemption introduced in July 2022 that cut the price of electric cars purchased through novated leases.

It found the tax cut could help to put an additional 1.5 million electric cars on Australian roads if extended until 2035, and had already aided in the purchase of 105,000 more EVs between 2022 and 2024.

An additional 200,000 plug-in hybrid vehicles could hit the roads in Australia by 2035 if they were allowed back into the scheme, the modelling found, and could contribute to a growing second-hand market by adding 870,000 low-emission cars.

Allowing the scheme to run until 2035 would also cut transport emissions by 50 per cent more than if the tax exemption was removed in 2027 when it is due to be reviewed, the report said.

Failing to take action to cut transport emissions in this way could see Australia miss its 2050 net-zero target, Electric Vehicle Council chief executive Julie Delvecchio said.

“With transport on track to be Australia’s largest emitting sector, incentives like the EV discount are critical to hitting our climate goals,” she said.

“Keeping this support until 2035 and bringing back plug-in hybrids into the scheme could deliver hundreds of thousands more new and second-hand EVs, making them affordable for more households.”

Electric car purchases under the scheme had been most popular in Melbourne, Sydney and Brisbane suburbs between 30km and 44km outside city centres, the analysis found, and to drivers on incomes between $90,000 and $120,000.

The findings showed the tax cut was making electric cars accessible to a wider group of people, National Automotive Leasing and Salary Packaging Association chief executive Rohan Martin said, including workers who would not have otherwise been able to switch from a petrol or diesel car.

“The electric car discount is popular with families on middle incomes who live in the outer suburbs,” he said.

The findings come despite a proposal from a Productivity Commission report to scrap the tax break, which it said had cost taxpayers between $1000 and $20,000 per tonne of carbon emissions abated.

The federal tax cut and state-based registration discounts should be replaced, the commission said, by greater support for car-charging infrastructure.

News all day, every day at CityNews.com.au.

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Australian Associated Press

Australian Associated Press

Share this

One Response to Keep electric car tax cut, remove pollution instead

David says: 15 September 2025 at 2:34 pm

Maybe the urgency and impetus would be more focused if we went past the failings of the Paris Agreement. Any green houses emissions stemming from our exports should also be included in our total footprint. If they are not something we are reliant on, i.e. part of our Australian economy, then we should simply stop exporting anything that we know will produce significant emissions e.g. gas and coal. This would also have the benefit of making domestics prices cheaper. Another plus. Anyone arguing that we need those exports is admitting they are part of Australia’s footprint and should be included in our emissions. Any ALP voters who believe they are supporting the environment need to have a long hard look in the mirror. If Albo could export coal to a foreign island just of the coast where he could efficiently transmit electricity back, then every coal mine in Australia that could possibly reopen would. Don’t kid yourself that Australia has any honest plan to reach an honest net zero, it’s not even close to heading in the right direction.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*

Related Posts

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews