News location:

Wednesday, September 23, 2026 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

We must call out grandstanding that antisemitism is on the rise

Forensic officers on the bridge where two gunmen opened fire at Bondi Beach. (Dean Lewins/AAP PHOTOS)

“If a passing greengrocer has the guts to risk his life at Bondi beach then I should risk being called names for writing a few cautionary words,” says columnist HUGH SELBY.

That readers have the choice to press on or consign me to the trash is one of the benefits of living in Australia in 2025. It’s something we take for granted.

Hugh Selby.

No one need fear a pre-dawn knock on the door by people authorised to censor our reading unless they are sharing plans for a terrorist attack, or intending to indulge their perverted fantasies about children.

When I put fingers to the keyboard, I do not fear that “authorities” will stop me writing, put me in prison, or arrange my early transformation from corporeal to ash.

For that I am truly grateful. As a community we allow a range of views, and a range of how those views are expressed, that is, for the most part, wonderful.

Our freedom to report events, to comment upon opinion, is, when it is fettered, said to reflect public policy constraints. Whether those constraints are too wide or too narrow is a never ending issue.

But public policy is not the only constraint upon freedom to express views about current issues. “Political correctness” describes the reality that pervasive sentiment can be so strong that to put a counter view is to invite trouble. 

Remember how popular was the “White Australia Policy”, “The white feather for cowards who wouldn’t sign up in World War I”, “All the way with LBJ” when our politicians sent young Aussies to war, “All female accusers are honest. All male deniers are liars”, and now, “If you oppose Netanyahu’s actions in Gaza you are an antisemite”. 

Which brings me to the horror at Bondi and to some dangerous political and religious-political responses.

So powerful and entrenched are some of those views and their proponents that my preferred option is to let it go through to the keeper. Silence is safe.

There are two reasons I have chosen to comment. 

First, if a passing greengrocer has the guts to risk his life at Bondi beach then I should risk being called names for writing a few cautionary words.

Second, my Jewish refugee father who was a doctor, and my grandfather who put a lot of effort into bringing World War II Jewish survivors from Europe to Australia, would be horrified to see anti-Netanyahu, anti-genocide sentiment described as antisemitic. 

Our safety, not political hyperbole is the first priority

Tragedies come in many forms: a busload of wedding guests dying because of driver error, or several hundred lives lost in a plane crash when ice interferes with equipment are tragedies. 

They are though, somehow less awful than the deliberately human-caused events such as Putin facilitating the shooting down of a commercial flight full of passengers, Netanyahu’s genocide in Gaza, or the brutal, planned shooting murders of our people celebrating on our beach, Bondi, on a summer’s early evening. 

How we talk about these deliberate acts of mass murder gives some insight into current perspectives.

For the moment there is one hero from the killing sands. There will be others as the full story emerges. Ahmed al Ahmed, a Sydney local who owns a fruit shop in Sutherland, disarmed one of the killers. That’s not an Anglo-Celtic-Irish name, not obviously Jewish either.

This guy showed the kind of courage, by his act of selflessness, that deserves a medal.

The same cannot be said of the disgusting statement by Netanyahu that our recent recognition of the Palestinian State caused the massacre. 

For those who have been oblivious to events these past few years, Hamas, by murdering more than a thousand innocents in Israel, gave Netanyahu his free pass to slaughter the innocents in the tens of thousands.

Netanyahu decided that a ratio of 50 to 1 by way of reprisal was a good calculus. He’s still at it, using any excuse to break every norm of humanity.

This is an annihilation pogrom against Palestinians carried out by those living in a state that was created to ensure there were no more pogroms.

The bones and ashes of the Jewish side of my family destroyed by the Nazis wish only that they could fuse with the clay into a Golem to put an end to this atrocity.

Which makes it important to call out the political grandstanding that “antisemitism” is on the rise in our country.

“Antisemitism” describes a way of prejudiced thinking that all Jews are inherently bad humans, or as Hitler made them, “beneath humans” and therefore able to be slaughtered.

There are misguided people, and always will be, who subscribe to that nonsense, just as there are anti-vaxxers, anti-fluoride in the water, and paranoid conspiracy believers. They are more a problem to themselves than they are a problem for us.

“Anti-Netanyahu genocide of humans in Gaza”, however, is a much more obvious, and understandable, reason for this week’s massacre at Bondi. Alas, it is also a reason for future violence.

Our political leaders should call it out accurately. Our safety depends upon it.

Former barrister Hugh Selby is a CityNews columnist, principally focused on legal affairs. 

 

 

 

News all day, every day at CityNews.com.au.

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Hugh Selby

Hugh Selby

Share this

4 Responses to We must call out grandstanding that antisemitism is on the rise

Rob Young says: 22 December 2025 at 1:40 pm

Your identification of Netanyahu, Gaza, and Israeli policy as explanatory context for violence against Jews outside Israel is disturbing. Whatever one’s view of Netanyahu—and many Jews vehemently oppose him—his actions do not explain, excuse, or contextualize the targeting of Jews in Sydney, Paris, London, or New York. Jews are not extensions of the Israeli state, nor are they legitimate stand-ins for its government. To frame attacks on Jews as an “understandable” response to Israeli policy is to engage in the very collective blame that defines antisemitism. Invoking your Jewish family history does not strengthen this argument; it weakens it. Jewish suffering in Europe was not caused by Jewish state policy, nor by Jewish power, nor by Jewish provocation. Such tropes have been repeatedly used to justify narratives that Jews had done something to deserve them. Today’s version simply substitutes “Netanyahu” for “the Elders,” but the structure is identical: Jews are made responsible for violence committed against them.
You suggest that antisemitism is being exaggerated, that antisemites are marginal cranks, and that the real danger lies in mislabeling opposition to Israel as hatred of Jews. But this framing ignores an observable fact: Jews are being attacked, harassed, excluded, and killed at sharply rising rates, explicitly as Jews. That is not theoretical. It is not hyperbole. And it cannot be waved away by redefining antisemitism so narrowly that only explicit Hitlerian rhetoric qualifies.
Most troubling is your claim that opposition to Israeli actions is “a much more obvious, and understandable, reason” for the Bondi massacre and for future violence. That sentence crosses from explanation into moral error. There is nothing understandable about murdering Jews for the actions of a foreign government. To say otherwise is to grant violence a rationale—and once violence has a rationale, it gains permission.
Free speech is essential. But free societies do not protect incitement to violence, nor do they pretend neutrality when one group is being targeted for death. This is not about silencing criticism of Israel. It is about refusing to cloak old hatreds in new political language.
There is no moral ambivalence available here. You either affirm that Jews are entitled to equal protection from violence regardless of Israeli policy, or you participate—however unintentionally—in the logic that endangers them. History shows where that logic leads. We ignore it at our peril.

Reply
cbrapsycho says: 28 December 2025 at 11:20 am

I agree with Hugh Selby on this issue 100% and there are many issues he addresses with which I disagree. It is sad that some people cannot see the logic of what he said due to their personal bias. He did not say that Jews deserve violence against them at all.

Selby does not frame his point of view as justification for the violence, does not blame Jews collectively, instead saying what many of us can see (Jews and non-Jews) that the actions of Netanyahu’s Israel and his claim that he is killing Palestinians including women and children for the sake of all Jews and the way he continually conflates Israeli and IDF action with support and action by all Jews puts that idea in the minds of many who oppose what he is doing. He claims that opposition of his actions are anti-Semitic and against all Jews, again conflating Israeli & IDF actions with Jewish action and support.

This does explain (but not justify) certain reactions by people who do not understand the differences between Jews and Israeli action, due to his very framing of Israel’s genocide as justified, thus conflating Judaism with killing and maiming children, with genocide and purposeful starvation all of which naturally causes anger. Not all people understand the complexity and nuances of what is happening, something that Netanyahu relies upon. He needs to see that his words and actions are harming Jews globally.

Blaming Albanese is typical of someone who cannot accept blame for the consequences of his own actions. The Jewish Council of Australia is trying very hard to help people understand that not all Jews support Netanyahu or Israel’s actions under him and his murderous, genocidal cronies.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*

Related Posts

Opinion

KEEPING UP THE ACT

First the iconic bus shelters are heritage listed, now our time-weathered chief has been heritage protected from removal, reports KEEPING UP THE ACT.

Opinion

Greens gambling tax call still doesn’t add up

"The Greens had an opportunity to demonstrate that their concern about the ACT's finances was serious enough to sit across the table from people they disagreed with and find common ground. And they chose not to," writes GWYN REES.

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews