News location:

Wednesday, October 7, 2026 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Coalition seeks to combat illicit smokes with price cut

A bid to dramatically cut the tobacco excise is triggering a fiery debate in Canberra. Susie Dodds/AAP PHOTOS

By Noah Secomb in Canberra

A pack of legal cigarettes would be around $30 cheaper under a coalition policy that it says will help stub out the growing black market for illicit tobacco.

After One Nation proposed a 75 per cent cut to the tobacco excise in August, Liberal Leader Angus Taylor is now pushing for it to be slashed by 80 per cent, which would see a packet of cigarettes fall to prices not seen since 2013.

Mr Taylor, who is seeking to counter a surge in popularity for Pauline Hanson’s party that has also seen support for his coalition drop to near-record lows, said he’s confident making legal cigarettes competitive would smash the illegal trade.

“I understand business, and sadly, this is a bad business that we have to destroy,” Mr Taylor told ABC News Breakfast on Thursday.

“We’ve got the worst of all worlds right now, with rising smoking, rising crime, and the result of this is that there’s less tax revenue for the government.”

The excise, which adds about $1.55 to the cost of every cigarette to take the average price of a legal pack of 25 sticks past $50, has been blamed for a surge in organised criminal activity and a wave of firebombings on retailers in the major cities.

An estimated 80 per cent of all tobacco consumed in 2025 was illicit, up from 12 per cent in 2017, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics.

A coalition-led inquiry, which handed down its final report on Friday, called for an immediate pause to the excise and further investigation into possible impacts of lowering taxes.

The Albanese government has resisted making any change to the excise, which reaps billions from the excise every year, despite growing pressure from economists and NSW Labor Premier Chris Minns.

Senior government minister Tanya Plibersek has rubbished the opposition’s policy, labelling it a race to the bottom.

“It will kill people. Like seriously, we have some of the lowest smoking rates in the world because cigarettes are expensive.” Ms Plibersek said on News24.

Greens Senator David Shoebridge has echoed these accusations and said the coalition policy ignores public health concerns.

Meanwhile, deputy Liberal leader Jane Hume is adamant the coalition has not copied the homework of One Nation.

“This is not a slogan. This is not a headline. This is a solution to a policy problem, a failure of this government,” she told Channel Nine’s Today.

The coalition’s policy includes a $200 million for law enforcement and a further $60 million for a public health campaign to discourage taking up a smoking habit.

News all day, every day at CityNews.com.au.

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Australian Associated Press

Australian Associated Press

Share this

2 Responses to Coalition seeks to combat illicit smokes with price cut

David says: 3 September 2026 at 3:12 pm

So why wasn’t the solution people making money out of selling radar detectors, to drivers to avoid speeding fines, to raise the speed limits. No money for those people making the radar detectors if people don’t need to buy them. Hang on, maybe it was because having people speeding more actually causes more deaths and a much bigger cost to the tax payer dealing with all the collateral damage.

Cutting the tobacco taxes may reduce the dwindling amount of money the tax player collects but the real issue is the cost to taxpayers dealing with all the self inflicted health issues many smokers expect tax payers to fund. Believing reducing the price of cigarettes wont have any impact on the uptake of smoking is like believe people will still drive at the same speed if the speed limits are increased.

Why not attack the problem at the cause, smoking significantly impacts people health and this self inflicted action has a significant impact on everyone else. Think of it like speeding, we haven’t speed limited all the cars and made them really expensive, we’ve approach the problem at the personal level. If you speed and you get caught then you will be penalized. The disincentive is applied directly to the individual. So why not approach smoking in the same way. Let health funds set prices based on smoking habits, health care services such as hospital etc determine how they administer and charge for care be based on whether people smoke. Smokers visiting doctors pay a minimum fee and don’t have access to bulk billing. ED puts people who smoke to the back of the queue. Start thinking of ideas like these and attack the problem like we have for speeding. If you choose to smoke (like speeding) and get caught then you pay the price for that action directly.

The ta payer is funding the criminals who make the money out of cigarettes. They are the ones footing the bill for all health issues etc. If the cigarette suppliers had to fund all the associated medical care etc the industry may well disappear overnight.

If people want to smoke them let them as long as they pay directly for all the increased costs associated with that decision. If they cannot afford to pay but can still make the decision to smoke then they should expect to go to the end of the list for any tax payer funded support.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*

Related Posts

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews