News location:

Wednesday, October 7, 2026 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

One Nation rejects need to model proposed super changes

Pauline Hanson’s party has unveiled proposed measures to Australia’s superannuation system. Joanna Kordina/AAP PHOTOS

By Andrew Brown in Canberra

One Nation has denied claims that allowing millions of people to tap into their nest eggs early would cause a rise in inflation.

Pauline Hanson’s party has unveiled proposed measures that would allow workers to divert one quarter of their superannuation contributions towards their rent or mortgage for up to three years.

Employers would still be required to pay 12 per cent superannuation, but super funds would then pay three per cent to people participating.

Under the scheme, someone earning about $90,500 a year would get an extra $44 a week to their income.

One Nation MP Barnaby Joyce denied claims by economists the scheme would boost inflation and exacerbate cost-of-living concerns.

“If there’s extra money in the economy and you put it into your bank account and don’t spend it, it has no inflationary aspect,” he told ABC Radio on Tuesday.

“Now we have to get economists to decide whether you get access to your own money? I mean, who are the people that have to give the imprimatur for you getting your own money?”

It’s estimated up to seven million people would be able to access their super early under the One Nation scheme.

Mr Joyce did not say whether economic modelling had been carried out on the proposal before it was unveiled.

“We shouldn’t have to model you getting your own money,” he said.

“There’s now the presumption by the socialists that everyone that’s a total moron is going to take money from a good return and take it to a bad return if they don’t need it.”

Assistant Treasurer Daniel Mulino said the policy would be an unwinding of the entire super system.

“It’s very clear that One Nation hasn’t modelled either that aspect of it or the impact that it will have on people’s ultimate balances,” he told ABC Radio.

“What One Nation is actually asking people to do is to steal from their own future in order to boost their incomes now. It’s a very irresponsible approach.”
Coalition housing spokesman Andrew Bragg said the opposition was not looking at similar policy offerings

“It’s very telling that the treasurer, having destroyed the budget and destroyed the housing system, can’t even bring himself to have this debate,” he told ABC Radio.

“We always have the usual policy reviews and and internal processes that you would expect in a democracy to be undertaken, and that’s ongoing across the board as you would hope.”

News all day, every day at CityNews.com.au.

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Australian Associated Press

Australian Associated Press

Share this

One Response to One Nation rejects need to model proposed super changes

David says: 9 September 2026 at 12:06 pm

So who exactly is worthy of doing the modelling? Let’s take the reported comments of AMP Chief Economist Shane Oliver who was quoted as saying regarding what was causing the cost of living crisis. “We haven’t solved the underlying problem, which all comes back to poor productivity, over-regulation, a tax system which is not working property and too much government spending. They’re the things we need to focus on, not these short-term sugar hits.” Remember, he is speaking on behalf of all those people struggling with the cost of living crisis. No mention at all of the small detail of housing going up %400 in the last 20 years and the impact that has. All those things he mentioned will only make a difference if they affect the housing affordability crisis. Funny how he didn’t mention that straight up. He is either stupid or just dishonest. Saying a tax system that isn’t working doesn’t mean anything as the scare campaigns have implied that Albos changes have broken the tax system even though they are focused on housing affordability. Does he mean we need more changes to the tax system to fix housing affordability, or, that is has just been broken and that is the cause? Or does he think housing affordability is fine where it currently is?

Well, I guess if he drives his nice high end BMW or whatever he drives down to the local bowling club and tried to tell everyone that housing affordability wasn’t worth mentioning when telling them why they were struggling, he wouldn’t need to worry about having one drink too many. There is no alcohol limit on riding in the back of an ambulance.

Do you think the voters you are trying to convince not to vote One Nation give any credence to any modelling anymore? Any modelling off “balances” that doesn’t include whether or not people own their own home when they retire is a waste of space. Do you think potential One Nation voters are currently more worried about their future super balance or whether they will own a home at some point?

One Nation ideas need some tuning to remove the using super for rent component, but, it is focused on workers financial future. It is recognizing that in a housing affordability crisis owning your own home is as important, if not more important, than having a pile of cash when you retire. It’s not about giving people cash so they can go and drive inflation up, it’s about helping them put their own roof over their heads. If your worried about people having more money to buy their own homes is going to drive up inflation then what do you think allowing property investors to own residential homes is doing to inflation? Oh, don’t tell me, I’m backed by the super and property investment industry, so clearly having investors driving up house prices and rents, making more people pay rent, et al, is driving inflation down. That’s the magic of property investment.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*

Related Posts

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews