News location:

Tuesday, September 22, 2026 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Planning legacy under threat from density push

An NCDC aerial photo of the early development of the Woden town centre.

“As elsewhere in Canberra, there is criticism that the government’s planning approach in Woden and Weston Creek favours developers. The poor design and construction quality of many higher-density dwellings is seen as a consequence,” wites planning columnist MIKE QUIRK.

The quality of the Woden and Weston Creek living environment is a legacy of past planning. However, it is facing challenges, especially from the pressure to maximise residential density. 

Mike Quirk.

Firstly, the planning legacy. Woden-Weston Creek was the first “newtown”, started in 1963 under the strategy of accommodating Canberra’s growth by the development of new settlement areas.

Activities were located in the context of a centres hierarchy. Major office employment and higher-order services and facilities (eg comparison retailing, swimming pools, libraries) were to be located at the town centre. Group centres at Curtin, Mawson and Weston were to be the locations of shops, services and facilities serving a group of suburbs. 

Facilities and services meeting day-to-day needs of the community were delivered through the development of neighbourhoods. Each neighbourhood would have a primary school, a pre-school, a shopping centre and neighbourhood park or playing field linked by pedestrian ways providing convenient walking and cycle access to the activities.

Its estimated population, at a Canberra population of 500,000, was 87,000. 

Substantial social, economic and demographic changes resulted in the population not reaching anticipated levels.

Between 1976 and 1981 the population fell from 63,700 to 59,000 with the population of Weston Creek falling from 27,700 to 20,500. The decline was primarily due to an ageing of population as the children of initial settlers left home and the lower fertility of new households coming to the new town. 

A consequence was the closure of Stirling College, Holder high and primary schools in Holder, Fisher and Curtin. Economic change led to a decline of trade at local centres, including the closure of most service stations and the major hardware store in the district.

By 2024 the population had increased to 65,200, primarily from development at the town centre where the population had increased from 2176 in 2011 to 6478. 

The town centre continues as a major node for Commonwealth offices. Westfield, anchored by department/discount department stores and major supermarkets, offers well-utilised retail and business services.

October 1971 and Bishop Morgan turns the first sod at the Southern Cross Woden site as club president Fred Quinane looks on.

The Hellenic and Southern Cross clubs are major recreational, community and entertainment hubs. The recently opened CIT, Woden Library, Health, senior citizens and youth centres provide essential services. The Phillip services area provides a diverse range of services and facilities including restaurants, automotive and business services. 

The group and local centres continue to provide convenient facilities and services to their surrounding populations. Several need improvements to the public realm including pedestrian and cycle connections. 

Challenges at the town centre include improving the public realm, particularly in the town square and Eddison Park; facilitating the mobility of the aged; managing traffic and parking issues, including light rail; “opening up” the shopping mall and how to best respond to development pressures of the Phillip services area. 

A major concern expressed by the Woden Community Council and others is the failure of the government to consider the need for community and recreation facilities. The last decade has seen the loss of the indoor basketball stadium and a pitch-and-putt golf course. The loss of the 50-metre pool and ice skating rink is likely.

The auditor-general is reviewing the process whereby the government changed the Territory Plan in 2022 to remove the requirement of a 50-metre pool, replacing it with a requirement for a 25-metre pool, just before the developer, Geocon, bought the lease. The developer is proposing 696 apartments. Independent MLA Fiona Carrick argues the decision seems to be based on cherry picked data and did not consider the current and future needs of the Woden and Weston Creek communities. 

An archive aerial picture from 1972 looking south over the Weston Creek Sewerage Works towards Holder.

As the late David Wright observed (CN, November 3, 2022) the challenge for the government is how to strike a balance between recreation and housing needs.

He argued the government needed to stop land speculation in the city’s recreation facilities. Developments are put forward for purposes that have nothing to do with their role as sporting clubs and nothing to do with the purposes the leases were granted. 

As elsewhere in Canberra, there is criticism that the government’s planning approach favours developers. The poor design and construction quality of many higher-density dwellings is seen as a consequence.

Another criticism is the opaqueness of the government’s decision making. It continually fails to inform the community of the trade offs in decisions about how the city should grow. The decision to build and extend light rail to Woden is a clear example. Why were other, potentially cheaper and more effective options, not evaluated? 

Woden-Weston Creek, given its attributes, will continue as an attractive residential and employment location. The 2025 Population Projections project a 2045 population in Woden of 58,000 and 30,000 in Weston Creek. Major opportunities in Woden include the town centre/town centre north, the Phillip services area/Athllon Drive/Mawson group centre corridor, and the North Curtin/Curtin group centre. Redevelopment is the main source of growth in Weston Creek. 

Can the government improve its management and increase the quality of development and transparently undertake comprehensive assessments of community needs and the economic, environmental and social benefits and costs of future developments/redevelopments?

Mike Quirk is a former NCDC and ACT government planner.

 

News all day, every day at CityNews.com.au.

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Share this

One Response to Planning legacy under threat from density push

cbrapsycho says: 24 October 2025 at 3:21 pm

Good article than raises some important issues for Canberra’s development.
Too much land provided for community use is sold off for the gain of wealthy or powerful others without compensating the community for its loss, nor providing equal community facilities to replace those lost.

This land was provided to community service providers at low or no cost to them in exchange for them providing community facilities and services, with financial benefits (such as rent, rates, fees and other taxes) forgone by the wider community in exchange for access to these community facilities.

When community service providers (whether sports clubs, churches, or other groups) mismanage their business and finances, they should not be able to sell off what are community facilities to cover their failures whilst depriving the community of the benefits they previously paid for and sustained.

This is not just about developers capitalising on community land but also about the executives in charge of that land and those managing it, gaining benefits from assets that are not theirs to sell.

This is no different to our federal government selling off government organisations to new investors, when the community that funded them for decades is deprived of their benefit without compensation for the costs of their contributions that sustained the organisations over the years, enabling them to grow and increase in value.

Nor is it different from providing mining companies free access to private and community land without compensation for the loss of its use, the damage to the asset and harm to those affected by its use.

It’s time that those who legitimately own community assets (ie the community) was given a say in how they’re used, managed or disposed of, whilst ensuring any benefits are fairly shared.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*

Related Posts

Letters

Why won’t Labor tell us what interest is costing?

"I wrote to the ACT Revenue Office and to the Treasurer. I even included a revised pie chart. I received an obfuscating, non-answer. Three further times, I politely requested clarification. No response," says letter writer JOHN MILLER.

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews