News location:

Canberra Today 12°/14° | Sunday, May 5, 2024 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Review / ‘Deadpool’ (MA) *

deadpool-gallery-03THE visual elements in Tim Miller’s directing debut include giant junk heaps, an aircraft carrier in the breaker’s yard, automotive mayhem, gunfire involving men who can’t shoot straight, varieties of brutal treatment from which no real human might get up and walk away and other improbabilities.

“Deadpool” is the nickname for a former soldier (Ryan Reynolds) who has acquired special powers during post-trauma recovery. He’s going to need them to survive the conflict against Warlord (Michael Benyaer). Deadpool has a small coterie of chums – particularly a giant Russian played by two people, one for voice, one for facial expression, and a small woman who morphs into a ball of fire when necessary.

The ideas underlying these shenanigans come from Marvel Comics, publishers of graphic novels for people who find reading tiresome but can get an idea of storyline from pictures.

Expanding graphic novels into moving images is not cheap. Marvel Comics knows that there is an audience out there prepared to pay production costs and profit. I’m sure Marvel Comics also understands the intellectual level of that audience. If you can read this review, yours is above it.

At all cinemas

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Dougal Macdonald

Dougal Macdonald

Share this

32 Responses to Review / ‘Deadpool’ (MA) *

Ben Garfath says: 13 February 2016 at 1:03 pm

Dear Marvel-movies hater*, the instructions for leaving my opinion here state “Please be nice”.
Apparently your City News overlords require nothing similar from you.
Including accuracy. Or mention of a plot. Or research.

This movie was made for fans of the over-the-top character Deadpool (first appearance, 1991), and those of the wider Marvel-verse. And probably adolescent males. And probably fans of Ryan Reynolds.

I could be wrong here, but I have a feeling that at about age 14, you were subjected to some sort of mind-altering trauma resulting in a disliking for all things over-the-top.

I am particularly upset however, of your inclusion and denigration of graphic novels as “for people who find reading tiresome but can get an idea of storyline from pictures”. An insult for readers and creators alike.

Now, I’m no art-genius. I haven’t ‘studied’ since high school. I’ve yet to spirally ascend the Guggenheim. I’d buy a hundred Rockwell’s over a single Warhol. I don’t ‘get’ Blue Poles.

But my parents taught me that “If you haven’t got anything constructive to say, don’t enter into the conversation”.

For anyone wanting an at-least neutral review, especially for movies sourced from comics, I suggest trawling the web outside of City News.

Rant partially put into words,

Ben Garfath

*That’s right! J’accuse! I went back thought 15-odd pages of your ‘reviews’. You, sir, are not a fan of anything Marvel, apparently.

p.s. Did you go to school with Margaret Pommeranz?

Reply
Sara says: 16 February 2016 at 7:17 pm

It’s blatantly obvious that Mr Mcdonald did absolutely no research for this review since it’s chock full of inaccuracies. I find it hard to believe that he even saw the movie.

One doesn’t have to like a movie to write a review. But apparently, one only has to be able to use a keyboard to get published.

Reply
Ben Garfath says: 17 February 2016 at 9:51 pm

I forgot to give Deadpool my rating: 9 out of 10. So many funnies! So many naughties! I don’t feel at all guilty, either. 🙂

Reply
Graeme Thornton says: 18 February 2016 at 5:34 pm

Dear Mr Macdonald,

I can tell from your writing that while you sat in the theater to watch deadpool you were probably wishing you were somewhere else.

And maybe you should of been.

You didn’t enjoy the film and that is perfectly fine. It is clearly not for everyone.

I’m not much of a fan of deadpool or the marvel universe in general myself, and that’s not why I’m here.

I’m here because I found your comments on graphic novels to be laughably ignorant and a little insulting.

But I’m not going to get into a debate about why comics should be considered a legitimate art form like any other medium because, whats the point? Those that know, know. As far as I’m concerned, that argument has already been won. And the nay sayers like you are a dying breed.

I read your “review” (which i give 1 star) and I read comics.

regards

Reply
Bri says: 19 February 2016 at 10:35 am

I like deadpool but the part that insulted me the most was the comments on comics and graphic novels, I feel like what you read doesn’t affect your intelligence! (Like fables, it’s quite wordy! And wonderful!)

Reply
Mal says: 19 February 2016 at 8:12 pm

Deadpool was a bit of mindless fun, but that in no way means that the source material, or its publisher are necessarily “for people who find reading tiresome but can get an idea of storyline from pictures.” As is often the case the simplistic storylines are the product of the transition to film rather than the original comics themselves.

Marvel, and its parent company Disney, would actually rather the Deadpool film fall flat so that they could regain the rights. Surely it is Fox who, “understands the intellectual level of that audience.” But why let the facts get in the way of a good rant?

It seems amazingly timely that Mr Macdonald demonstrate his ignorance of the comics medium in Canberra this week. As it happens the cream of Australia’s comics creators, including Award winners and scholarly doctors are descending on Canberra to attend and present at the first annual Australian Comic Arts Festival.

I encourage you, Mr Macdonald to spend some time this weekend rather than sitting in the privacy of a darkened cinema, to mingle with some of the sharp minds that will be at The Novotel Canberra on the 20th and 21st of February.

http://www.acaf.com.au

Every day is a school day Mr Mcdonald.

Reply
Nick says: 19 February 2016 at 8:39 pm

Can’t believe such a biased review got published. The author clearly has no appreciation of graphic novels in general and goes out of his way to insult them and their readers, which I would be consider to be out of bounds for a movie review. I would suggest employing film reviewers who have a level of appreciation of other types of popular media, so that adaptations such as deadpool can be competently judged based on their book to screen abilities, not just the narrow view of the author.

Reply
Erin says: 19 February 2016 at 8:49 pm

Dear uninformed and incredibly rude individual who apparently dislikes fun and is obviously one of those people who doesn’t like other people enjoying things,

I find your review inaccurate, lacking research and an actual review of the movie itself. This seems like a rant written by a man who doesn’t like Marvel or comic books. That is my first problem with this review; if you want to write a review you should actually watch the movie and research the characters and plot, and those involved with the movie in order to give an appropriate response to cinematography, script, character development, costume, visuals, etc. None of that is present in this horrible attempt at a review.

My second problem is that you attack readers of graphic novels and comic books which has nothing to do with your task of reviewing the movie Deadpool. So, you claim comics and graphic novels are “for people who find reading tiresome but can get an idea of storyline from pictures”. Well, while I don’t judge people on their choice of enjoyment (those who don’t read novels are fine by me because that’s their choice, please don’t take what I’m about to say as an insult, I do not intend it that way) I would like to refute your statement by saying I am an avid consumer of Marvel comics, Deadpool titles being one of my favourites, and I am also an English Lit major at the ANU. So, how would you like to say again that those who enjoy Marvel comics find reading tiresome? I believe, judging by your pathetic attempt at a review, I am probably far better read than you are and I find comics to be as intellectually stimulating as some novels and definitely more visually stimulating than constantly staring only at miniscule words on white pages. I consume novels and comic books with equal voracity. I can’t get enough of either. However, that is not to say that those who do not read novels and read only comic books are any less well-read, considering that every theme you can find in a novel is also found in comic books.

So, to finish, I suggest you take your arrogant condescension and hatred of all things fun, and shove them where the sun don’t shine. Other people’s enjoyment of the things they like probably seems like a threat to your fun-hating self but I assure you it’s not. Please refrain from going near any more Marvel movies lest you accidentally enjoy them *gasp*.

Regards.

Reply
Erin says: 19 February 2016 at 8:54 pm

Oh and Deadpool? It’s the best movie based off a Marvel comic I have ever seen and definitely in my top ten favourite movies. Trust me, my intelligence is not lowered by my enjoyment of the violence and swearing and inappropriate nature of the movie.

Reply
The Modern Meltdown says: 19 February 2016 at 9:02 pm

As a fan of film, be it high brow Oscar Bait movies or low brow action brawlers, I enjoy well thought out well written reviews be them negative or positive.Your job is not to pass judgement on the on the medium of comics nor the people reading them. Your job, plan and simple is to review the film and offer an opinion based on your observations. So allow me to offer you a few pointers. You should point out what aspects of the film you didn’t like. Examples being cinematography, acting, musical score, story structure and flow. It also doesn’t hurt to mention items you liked you can even mention the above subjects in this respect as well. Put shortly, your review is the worst I have ever read in my life, you used it as a vehicle to attack people that you think are intellectually lower then you. At best you are uniformed, at worst you are a cyber bully. If you were working for me I would have fired you on the spot for handing in such garbage and your editor.

Reply
Andrew says: 19 February 2016 at 9:32 pm

OK, just saying, as everyone else is:
This is a good movie.
You need to realise that wasn’t a review, but an insult to the makers and enjoyers of the movie.
You have no respect for the entire comic book industry that spits out great art, stories, and awesomeness in small time frames.
Your whole review was kinda a dick move.

Reply
Caitlin Pengilly says: 19 February 2016 at 9:52 pm

Mr McDonald,

Overall I’d have to give your review half a star out of five.

Your review seemed to be incredibly short on anything that could be considered a review. This was made very apparent when you resorted to insulting people for their reading choices. I could resort to a similar tactic but unfortunately I possess morals and find it particularly unsavoury.

The impression gathered by your “review” is that you walked into the cinema already hating it and searched throughout the duration for things to hate. No longer can your “review” be counted as fair or unbiased.

The lack of research and understanding of the movie is in itself, laughable. You failed to mention the plot, you mentioned only the lead actors name and seemed to have completely missed the point of Deadpool as a character. He is a drastic juxtaposition to the more mainstream (and kid-friendly) heroes we celebrate, whose purpose is to point out and demonstrate the absurdity of the super hero world.

Furthermore, you seemed to have paid no regard to the cinematography or the script writing which contributes largely to the movie as a finished product.

For the reasons above I give your review the score of half a star out of five.

In future, please address these criticisms and learn from your mistakes.

Caitlin Pengilly

Reply
Anthony Jurd says: 19 February 2016 at 10:07 pm

What I find hilarious here, is that in a very short review the author got so things wrong that you would get right if you had even just watched the trailer. And whilst opinions on comics and graphic in general the review does not actually provide a single critique of Deadpool itself. CityNews, your slogan is: ‘Well written, well read’. To which I would say: hardly, if you published this.

One passing thought. The author is writing a film review that directly denigrates those ‘who find reading tiresome but can get an idea of storyline from pictures’. As a film reviewer, or at least a hobbyist one, you must surely realise that films are stories told with pictures. In fact they have even fewer fancy reading words than a comic book.

Reply
Carlos says: 19 February 2016 at 10:40 pm

Congrats Dougal you have single handedly stopped me from ever reading 1 of your reviews ever again.
Please do some research and maybe even watch the movie before you “review” it

Reply
bobagorof says: 19 February 2016 at 11:14 pm

I can’t believe someone actually agreed to publish this ‘review’ from Dougal McDonald, in which he describes an abstract version of the plot that does little more than reach a word count. It provides absolutely no help to someone wanting to know whether the film is worth seeing. I guess that’s what you get for reading stuff on the Internet.

Whatever happened to the days when a review would actually look at what the film was trying to achieve, the themes it addresses, how it succeeds and where it fails? Instead of a reasoned article that addresses the worth of the film, we get 190 words of someone being a jerk.

Having seen this film, I can say it won’t be to everyone’s taste. It has a weird, dark sense of humour, and that humour is rampant throughout. The main character knows he is in a film and frequently breaks the ‘fourth wall’ to talk to the audience. The movie pokes fun at itself and the superhero genre as a whole (something that I would think Mr. McDonald would have appreciated, as he evidently loathe graphic novels. The reason, then, to review a movie adaptation of a graphic novel defies the capacity of a sentient being). The action sequences are over the top. Most of the humour is crass. But at the same time, we see our anti-hero struggling to come to terms with the hand life has dealt him, and his quest for revenge. There’s some really touching moments, which the director does a great job of weaving in and showing us a human side to our anti-hero. I also thought the pacing was well done, jumping between action and flashbacks in a way that was engaging and provided backstory without getting bogged down.

Unfortunately, Dougal McDonald missed all of that. But if you can read his review… then you already realised you wasted your time.

Reply
Craig HS says: 20 February 2016 at 12:32 am

Dear Dougal,

I can’t be certain, not having access to your facebook page, but I do believe you have accidently swapped your “crankypants” status update with your movie review.

For there is certainly no review to be seen here.

Reply
Mike says: 20 February 2016 at 12:54 pm

The best thing about this review is the comments. Regardless of your opinion on Deadpool, this is an extremely lazy, tragically written review. Even forgiving the juvenile attack on graphic novels, the substance (or lack thereof) of the review in a critical sense is not worthy of publishing.

Thankfulky the comments save an amateur piece of journalism and gave me something entertaining to read.

Reply
Sandra Fowler says: 20 February 2016 at 1:37 pm

Jesus Dougal, did a comic touch you in your no-no zone once? Why the steaming dump on comic fans? Did you wake up with a nasty case of testicular tortion this morning? It’s like you watched the trailer and nothing else. If you’re having an, “I hate everyone and I’m going to make you all as miserable as I feel” day, find a quiet corner to rage in instead. My five year old has a better understanding on how not to be a dick.

Reply
Zoe says: 20 February 2016 at 2:35 pm

Wait – are we ignoring the bit where the only fact the reviewer included is wrong?

‘Acquired special powers during post-trauma recovery.’ It was cancer, wasn’t it? Not ‘trauma’?

I haven’t seen the film – yet – but I’m pretty sure it was cancer.

My husband and I are off to see it as soon as we can. At last count we had seven degrees between us, including a PhD from Cambridge. Fortunately we’re in the majority who don’t find their intellect threatened by fun – especially not whip-smart fun like Deadpool.

Reply
Wade says: 20 February 2016 at 3:45 pm

Hey! Look! It’s an old man who hasn’t felt the touch of a woman since the Reagan administration prattling poorly about the best-selling R-rated movie of all time. Be careful Dougie-bear, that strange shadow you sense in the night might escalate from simply watching you sleep to making sure your Pokémon pajamas are a darker shade of brown.

Reply
Rob says: 20 February 2016 at 8:20 pm

Hi, sorry as there were no pictures in your story I didn’t understand it. Certainly couldn’t find a review but a mans bias opinion. Certainly the best work of fiction I’ve ever read. Though I might be slow or something. Oh well, back to enjoying my incredible life.

Reply
Alessio says: 20 February 2016 at 9:44 pm

There’s a glaring typo in the About Dougal Macdonald bit under the article – it reads:
“CityNews” film reviewer
Instead it should be:
CityNews “film reviewer”

Reply
Aj says: 21 February 2016 at 1:16 am

Dear Mr. MacDonald,

You really did not have to start by being uncivil. But in keep with that tone of being disrespectful let me blast my load.

If you are going to review a damn movie then….

DO
YOUR
JOB

You DONT have to like all the movies. The fact you can not get very simple plot points right, makes me think you were either a sleep (maybe just didnt go?) or you were so dumb your brain can not compute simple things, like, right or left.

Attacking things (like your view ship and graphic novels) because you dont understand something makes you a Richard Cranium. Not a Reviewer. There are several “Graphic novels” on the New York Times best sellers and best written lists. Are they lowbrow?

There are also really people, who love films and want to share that experience with others! local talent of artist who dont like everything and would be happy to review it.

And yes. I know it’s a free mag, Citynews should fire you and ask for their money back because “they understand the intellectual level of that audience.” And know when someone insults there viewership it’s never good business.

Reply
maniciesMani says: 21 February 2016 at 9:11 am

While I’d LIKE to say that this is a lazy, poorly thought out, inaccurate review of a movie this man clearly hasn’t seen, there’s pretty much no review TO review. It’s like…three paragraphs. Three paragraphs of wrong facts and that’s it. This is a man who doesn’t care about his job. Guys, this is clearly the work of someone who just wants to be fired! Have a little sympathy for the poor shmuck.

Reply
Gaston says: 22 February 2016 at 12:59 am

I stopped reading when the antagonist was mislabeled by the reviewer as “Warlord”. This review reminds me of the infamous Rex Reed take on “Cabin in the Woods”. If you’re going to review the movie, watch the movie.

Reply
Tristan says: 22 February 2016 at 1:38 pm

Having studied professional writing and learnt how to correctly construct a critical document when I was in YEAR 10 at high school, I can see that the City News obviously has no genuine idea of what “Well Written” actually constitutes, because as far as this review goes, its structure alone belies its parent website’s obvious mission statement. A “well written” review can usually be identified by its objective critique of the subject matter, but all I see here is a gross blanket statement about people who read and enjoy comic books, or as the reviewer likes to call them “graphic novels”.

So, with the same dismissively elitist faux-intellectualism the reviewer has deftly handed out with 50% of this four paragraph review as judgement against comic fans and those who work on them, and as someone who works as both a comic book writer and illustrator professionally for these companies from the comfort of my own home in Melbourne, I am calling to at least get your facts right when you decide to defecate on something and insult people — PARTICULARLY when it comes to something even a child can grasp, such as characters named numerous times on screen — particularly one whose running theme revolves around his identity.

Sincerely,

Tristan

Reply

Leave a Reply

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews