Review / ‘The Children Act’ (M) *** and a half

Emma Thompson as Judge Fiona Maye.

A COURT of law and a theatrical performance are similar in numerous ways. Law courts have provided themes for many memorable plays and movies. Today, we are taking in Richard Eyre’s filming of Ian McEwan’s screenplay adaptation of his own novel.

I’m currently enjoying repeat broadcasts of Martin Shaw playing Judge John Deed, slayer of metaphorical jurisprudential dragons for 29 episodes harking back to the turn of the century. “The Children Act” is a close cousin to that theme. And for High Court Judge Fiona Maye confronting the sort of decision-making crisis that John Deed must negotiate, it stars Emma Thompson. For me, that’s bliss.

The issue about which McEwan wrote arises under the UK’s Children Act, enacted in 1989, amended 2004. It begins with a clear statement of intent, that children’s welfare should be the paramount concern of the courts.

At age 17 years and nine months, Adam (Fionn Whitehead) has leukaemia. Two medications are available for treating it. But they first require the patient to receive a blood transfusion. Adam’s parents must agree to that going ahead.

But the family are Jehovah’s Witnesses, for whom blood transfusions are forbidden for reasons that the film’s opening passages explain. For the next three months Adam will remain a child as the Act defines. And in any case, he’s an intelligent young man who agrees that it’s contrary to his belief.

In coming to her decision, Judge Maye takes the unconventional step of visiting Adam in hospital to ask how he wishes to proceed and why it should be so. The film’s second half deals with the sequel to her judgement. The film’s dramatic environment is made more difficult (for Fiona, not the filmgoer) by the fact that her husband (Stanley Tucci) has dropped a bombshell into domesticity. He plans to have an affair. And Adam, after recovery, begins to follow her, rather short of stalking but certainly unwelcome and discombobulating.

The phrase best summarising Fiona is dominant to a plot full of new challenges for which her professional and private lives have not prepared her. Emma Thompson’s portrayal of her is all you might expect. One word covers it. Superb. Or any other synonym.

At Capitol 6 and Palace Electric

One Response to “Review / ‘The Children Act’ (M) *** and a half”

  1. December 2, 2018 at 10:56 am #

    This film contains several howling medical and transfusion errors. In the critical court scene, the lawyer for the parents challenges the experts by asserting that blood transfusions can give you HIV, Hepatitis B and graft-versus-host-disease (along with others such as chagas).

    She was quite wrong. The screening processes for blood donations screen out HIV and Hep B (& C) – and have for several decades.

    The worst mistake was about graft-versus-disease (GVHD). This is the natural and predictable reaction – by the host body – to receiving a bone marrow transplant. A BMT occurs after all chemotherapy had failed to stop leukemia.

    The bone marrow is donated by a compatible person (who can be a family member) and is transplanted in the form of pink liquid, somewhat like a blood transfusion.

    GVHD occurs because the recipient body perceives the donated bone marrow as a foreign object and attempts to reject it. This attempted rejection is suppressed by other drugs, not always successfully. The survival rate after 5 years for a BMT is about 21%.

    Given there were medical advisors to the film, the errors made by the script writers are unforgivable.

Leave a Reply

Leave your opinion here. Please be nice. Your Email address will be kept private.