News location:

Canberra Today 9°/13° | Wednesday, October 20, 2021 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Home ownership fades as Barr goes surfing 

“A quick look at social media reflects the anger felt by ‘Ken Behrens’ in the fading hope of home ownership with so little land being made available and prices skyrocketing,” writes political columnist MICHAEL MOORE.

THE ACT Budget provides a big hit for home owners and does little to make homes more affordable. 

Michael Moore.

Instead, the government of Andrew Barr is surfing the wave of income from the increasing value of housing and the commensurate increase in revenue from rates and land tax. The Budget fails to find a serious solution to the challenge of home ownership.

A quick look at social media reflects the anger felt by “Ken Behrens” in the fading hope of home ownership with so little land being made available and prices sky-rocketing. 

However, the Chief Minister’s prime goals during such a period of uncertainty make sense. In Barr’s words, it is “a Budget delivered under difficult circumstances, but one which has a simple purpose: to deliver what we promised the people of Canberra and to drive Canberra’s recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic”.

These are lofty ideals. And there are good-news stories that reflect promises made at the election. These include increases in funding for more nurses, significant investment in capital infrastructure, transport, education, training and health. 

Climate action includes building on the reputation as the jurisdiction which is “the renewable energy capital of the nation”. One example is the investment of $150 million allowing “zero interest loans for rooftop solar panels, household battery storage, zero emissions vehicles and energy efficient electric appliances”. The idea is that “more households can make the right investments in their home”.

However, these savings for individual households are countered by the constant increasing rates in the ACT. The Budget papers state: “The increase in average general rates for residential and commercial properties during the five years of Stage 3 of tax reform (2021-22 to 2025-26) will be 3.75 per cent per year”. 

This will bring about an almost doubling of rates from the time that the tax reforms were launched in 2012. 

As the Budget papers explain: “Under the government’s tax-reform program, increases in general rates above the growth in Wage Price Index are used to fund reductions in own-source revenue from the abolition of inefficient taxes such as insurance and conveyance duties”. 

The Budget figures in the 2012-13 budget showed an expected income from rates at just under $300 million. Since that time the rates have moved to a prediction for the coming year of close to $660 million and in the out years of the Budget going to nearly $800 million. 

And what of the inefficient taxes? Conveyancing was one of the taxes cited at the time. Considering the exponential rise in the price of homes, it would be helpful to see a reduction in this form of taxation. 

How has the government managed? In 2012 the government budgeted for conveyancing revenues of $272 million. This year conveyancing will bring in $315 million. This is double-dipping.

The government tax-reform initiatives that were led by former Labor MLA Ted Quinlan looked to reduce stamp duty and other “inefficient” forms of taxation. The same approach was taken by the then Treasurer, Andrew Barr who stated in his June 2012 speech on the Budget that it “abolishes and reforms a number of inefficient taxes in favour of more efficient, simpler and more progressive taxes”. 

He has repeated the same message about reduction of inefficient taxes nearly a decade later.

As the government went into an election that year after embarking on taxation reform, they were incensed at suggestions from the Liberal Opposition of the time that rates would triple. 

Ted Quinlan took on the Liberals, arguing they were painting a worst-case, in his words, “dire scenario”. Considering the 20-year time frame and the current trajectory for rates through the transition, it is looking clearer and clearer that the Liberals were on the mark in predicting a tripling of the rates.

In 2012, the overall budgeted revenue for the ACT was $3.75 billion. This year, the budgeted revenue is $6.6 billion. Taxation from our own sources, excluding GST and other Commonwealth input was $1.27 billion in 2012 and this year is $2.21 billion. 

With revenue doubling in less than a decade, it is not hard to understand why “Ken Behrens” is feeling the weight of an increased and increasing taxation burden.

Michael Moore is a former member of the ACT Legislative Assembly and an independent minister for health. He has been a political columnist with “CityNews” since 2006.

 

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Michael Moore

Michael Moore

Share this

One Response to Home ownership fades as Barr goes surfing 

Palmerston's Masked Lament says: October 13, 2021 at 7:52 am

It is an oft-stated truism that runs along the lines of “the only thing Barr stands for is Barr”, and this runs through everything he says and does. The harsh spotlight of the past 8 weeks of nearly daily press conferences should have shown his foibles in starker detail had the Press Gallery been less compliant, and more focussed.

But on Rates this was always going to happen. The back of envelope maths showed the direction immediately. But this “progressive” taxation reform was built on three principles:

1. Social complacency. The Hare Clark voting system had cemented a Labour Government in place so “meh”.

2. A mobile workforce. Few people come to Canberra to stay long term. It is a Boom Town with a transient population.

3. Greed. The removal of “inefficient taxes” would never really happen.

It would also be useful to remind readers of Barr’s statements around the 10 year mark that the original modelling was wrong and Sales Tax would always stay.

And it would also be useful to push Barr on whether he understands the concept of wage stagnation that wasn’t obviously in 2012 is now the order of the day and increasing costs year on year above CPI does not allow the populace to spend the money he thinks they have.

Yes I am tired of Barr. And I am tired of the constant drone of spin because to date nothing he has done is close to being vibrant or progressive. I fear we are now sitting solidly on foundations of muddy clay and the post-Barr Canberra administrations will be forced into fixing the problems he created. And that, I fear, will be his legacy.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews