News location:

Canberra Today 12°/15° | Wednesday, May 8, 2024 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

So, how’s our money spent? Who would know

There are public-transport options available today that were not in the thinking when the tram concept and development corridors were proposed over a decade ago by the property lobbyists. Photo: Paul Costigan

“The Rattenbury-Barr government operates with a lack of transparency and is comfortable with the use of disingenuous spin and obscurity to hide the reality of how it spends money.,” writes “Canberra Matters” columnist PAUL COSTIGAN.

THREE presentations at the Inner South Canberra Community Council’s (ISCCC) September meeting made it very clear how this ACT Greenslabor government is not aligned with the aspirations and values of the residents of this city. 

Paul Costigan.

To understand the values of the Greenslabor politicians (and their minders), people have learnt to ignore the worthy words and frequent announcements. 

Instead, residents are looking at the government’s expenditure as this is the real indicator of the ACT Greenslabor values. Getting your head around their expenditure is not easy to do. 

The Rattenbury-Barr government operates with a lack of transparency and is comfortable with the use of disingenuous spin and obscurity to hide the reality of how it spends money. The ISCCC presentations laid bare the depressing state of the values of the ACT government. 

Using his well-established forensic research of government documentation, Dr Khalid Ahmed made it clear that the Greenslabor government is operating way beyond its means with increasing huge budget deficits now forecasted. There is no sign that it is willing to change directions and to live within its means. Khalid’s charts were stunning – and very upsetting!

Graham O’Loghlin applied a detailed and logical argument why the Gungahlin tram sort-of made sense – if you ignored the enormous costs to other programs such as housing, education and health. However, there was no way these same infrastructure measures could be used to justify the tram south to Woden. It does not stack up – let alone that its costs will be enormous (goodbye to more of the housing, health, education and community budgets). 

No-one was questioning whether the government should improve public transport between Tuggeranong, Woden and Civic. O’Loghlin is a public transport advocate and enthusiast. 

The reality is that there are public-transport options available today that were not in the thinking when the tram concept and development corridors were proposed over a decade ago by the property lobbyists. The best-guess projected costs for the Woden tram are beyond the finances available, especially given the enormity of the growing deficits. The Greenslabor Woden tram will be much less efficient and costlier than well-established public transport alternatives that should now be considered.

Dr John Bell, from the Deakin Residents’ Association pulled apart an unpublished report prepared for the government on the redevelopment opportunities that the government hopes to create as the tram arrives in the southern suburbs. 

The logic used for the report was skewed to suit the Rattenbury-Barr way of thinking. The report ignored the 21st century priorities of urban planning and well-established research reports on urban design that address the climate emergencies. 

The no-longer confidential report will be used to justify the massive developments along the tram corridor that Greenslabor knows will degrade the standard of living in these established suburbs. The tram south makes no sense except to the development lobby who can see dollar signs and 30 per cent profits on massive developments within the southern suburbs.

This ACT Greenslabor government is firmly in the pocket of a significant branch of the property industry and urban-development decisions are made to keep them on-side. 

A mix of Greenslabor ministers oversee a planning system that has been broken to such an extent that there is only a tokenistic (at best) consideration of architecture, landscape design, urban planning and biodiversity in how development is delivered.

The ACT Liberals have tended to be fence sitters on urban development and planning issues. They are part of the problem as their inability to present real alternatives has empowered Rattenbury and Barr to do what they do best – to sideline the aspirations of the residents. 

Two years out from the 2024 ACT elections, the ACT Liberals and any independents have enough time to get their act together to offer alternatives to the Greenslabor coalition. 

The other unlikely scenario for change would be for the ACT Greens members and any thinking members still left in ACT Labor to say enough is enough and to nominate a new set of candidates for the 2024 elections. People should be able to trust an elected ACT government. Desperate times require desperate solutions.

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Paul Costigan

Paul Costigan

Share this

4 Responses to So, how’s our money spent? Who would know

Red says: 5 October 2022 at 6:21 pm

Isn’t there a legal way to stop this runaway spending spree if “This ACT Greenslabor government is firmly in the pocket of a significant branch of the property industry and urban-development decisions are made to keep them on-side.”, as Paul Costigan so aptly puts it?

Reply
Jane says: 6 October 2022 at 11:51 am

It was be good if there was, Red. Sadly not. Governments of all persuasions seem to think they can spend our money any way they like. It’s a pity our current ACT government is so firmly in the pockets of the “developers”.

Reply
S. Draw, K. Cab. says: 6 October 2022 at 10:42 pm

“nominate a new set of candidates”. Sadly true that in the current reality of our one-party-state the only way to change government is to have an internal spill.

IMHO the Libs present no alternative. Given their silence, should they get in, it wouldn’t surprise me that they keep with the status quo and probably double it. pox.

Teals? Mr Pocock?
(but please, just drop the city stadium idea, it’s on par with Rattenbury’s tram)

Reply
Robert says: 7 October 2022 at 9:41 am

This is very worrying. Every Canberran must now seriously consider tossing this government from power for the sake of our economic security and future standard of living. The only people who seem to prosper here are big developers. Oh for the days of Jon Stanhope.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Opinion

KEEPING UP THE ACT

It's back by popular request, another burst of Rattenbury's Believe It Or Else! – tall tales (but probably untrue) from the bowels of the ACT government.

Letters

Waiting for the bus office that never opens

Letter writer COLIN LYONS, of Fadden, says the neglect of the Transport Canberra information office in Alinga Street, Civic, is an example of "incompetent public transport management in Canberra by the government".

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews