News location:

Sunday, October 11, 2026 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Immigration ‘division’ as parties jump on bandwagon

Immigration is shaping up as the coalition’s next big policy battleground. (Erik Anderson/AAP PHOTOS)

By Ben McKay and Callum Godde

Immigration is on the tip of conservative politicians’ lips as a former Howard government minister cautions the coalition not to lurch to the right to regain voter support.

One Nation leader Pauline Hanson drew an estimated 700 people to a “Put Australia First” rally in Melbourne on Sunday, where she called for immigration to be reduced until “we clean up our own backyard”.

“Since I’ve been elected to parliament in 1996, I have seen the plan to divide us as a nation with multiculturalism,” the Queensland senator told the crowd.

A counter-protest drew almost as many people as the anti-immigration rally, based on police’s crowd calculations.

State Premier Jacinta Allan clapped back at Ms Hanson’s quip that she didn’t “want to move to Victoria” and accused Ms Hanson of trying to “stoke fear and division” for political purposes.

“That sort of division is not welcome here,” she told ABC Radio on Monday.

With the coalition bleeding support to One Nation, Sussan Ley has committed to releasing the opposition’s migration principles before the end of 2025.

The Liberal leader declared issues of language and values would “form part of that conversation”.

Shadow home affairs minister Jonno Duniam has floated possible stronger tests for aspiring migrants.

The idea has attracted support from National leader David Littleproud but Amanda Vanstone, immigration and multicultural affairs minister from 2003 to 2007 under Liberal prime minister John Howard, suggested the devil would be in the detail.

“I’ve got some anxiety about those tests, but (that’s) not to say you couldn’t devise one that was effective,” she told ABC Radio on Monday.

Ms Vanstone backed Ms Ley’s move to settle basic policy principles as Australians were “divided about immigration at the moment”, but argued non-discriminatory immigration should be retained.

In mid-November, after the Liberals ditched support for net zero, potential leader-in-waiting Andrew Hastie posted on social media that he wanted to “cut Labor’s uncontrolled immigration” and the topic would be the “next big debate”.

People in the coalition and others were “jumping on the bandwagon” and the answer to the Liberals’ woes was in the centre ground, Ms Vanstone said.

“Only an idiot thinks going out to either extreme left or right … will work,” she said.

News all day, every day at CityNews.com.au.

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Australian Associated Press

Australian Associated Press

Share this

One Response to Immigration ‘division’ as parties jump on bandwagon

David says: 1 December 2025 at 2:34 pm

The sad fact is neither party has the ability to do the right thing by average Australia wage earners. At present, if you believe the figures, there should be no need for an tax advantages for property investors as we shouldn’t need them in the market. There are enough people looking to become home owners to support any building. If they cannot support it it is not because of their desire to fund the building of new houses, it’s because they cannot afford to build housing at the current building costs. Property investors are required because average Australian can no loner afford to build a home. So why are we bringing in all these extra immigrants to help with building? Because property investors need them. They are not solving the housing affordability crisis, they are fueling it. Ask yourself, how long have we had increased immigration (or how long has the current ALP been in power) and at any point has housing affordability improved? And, before you jump to the obvious lie, prices don’t drop by increasing supply if you need to increase demand in an attempt to get there. Houses don’t spontaneously shed little houses that grow up for other people to live in and increase supply. People however ………

This shouldn’t be about left and right, it should be about common sense. It’s being made political by politicians so they can blur the reality.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*

Related Posts

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews