News location:

Friday, January 10, 2025 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Here’s to better outcomes from the new Assembly

Independents Thomas Emerson, Fiona Carrick… elected in October.

“With a minority government installed we can now look forward to the New Year in the hope a government that’s more accountable to the Assembly will deliver better outcomes for all Canberrans,” writes political columnist MICHAEL MOORE.

This election year started with: “The Labor-Greens Coalition government will be judged. A decision will be taken about whether the Liberal opposition is really up to governing the Territory”. 

Michael Moore.

There was a decisive judgement in October returning Chief Minister, Andrew Barr to government in a minority capacity, rather than as a coalition with the Greens. Across the world, while voters were returning right-wing governments, the ACT returned a left-leaning Labor government – allowing Labor to rule through to 2028.

This was also the year starting with: “A challenge will be launched by a series of independent candidates who will seek to hold the balance of power” and noting, “there are outstanding candidates already emerging across the political spectrum”. Independents Tom Emerson and Fiona Carrick would be elected in October.

By March, the Canberra Hospital system was in more strife. The accreditation was lost for the Centenary Hospital for Mothers and Babies. A draft report from the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetrics and Gynaecologists argued that patients were being put at risk. Accreditation was reduced to just six months while the management sorts the “challenges”.

Rebranding the health services seemed a good idea… but how much difference did it really make? By the end of the year, and after the election, we were being told that a new administrative arrangement would solve the problems. 

Will the re-appointed Rachel Stephen-Smith as Minister for Health be able to move the hospital services from where they have languished amongst the worst in Australia to amongst the best?

Voluntary Assisted Dying was put back on the agenda after the power was restored by the federal parliament. Minister Tara Cheyne took the ACT through an extensive consultative process. There was a positive report from an Assembly and the legislation was passed. Before it comes into effect, however, it really does need some broadening in scope.

In March, national waste-water analysis painted an interesting picture of drug use in Canberra and across Australia. Canberrans’ drug use was generally on a par with other parts of Australia. However, the use of some drugs, such as methamphetamine, was way below the Australian average. Others, such as heroin, were being more widely used in this territory.

A review of the recent laws that decriminalised the use of hard drugs as well as cannabis will be revealing. It is highly likely that any review will find similar use to Australia. However, I suspect there will be less harm and less valuable police time wasted on personal use of illicit drugs.

Gambling reform also came under the spotlight in both the ACT and at the federal level. Labor’s Dr Marisa Paterson found herself “between a rock and hard place” while she worked hard to ensure a sound Labor policy. Federally, Senator David Pocock accused the Albanese government of “a total cop-out” over failure to deliver on gambling reform. Conflicts of interest remain!

What about anti-corruption commissions? The National Anti-Corruption Commissioner Justice Paul Brereton was found to have engaged in “misconduct” when he rejected further investigation into the senior public servant in the robo-debt scandal. This was despite the investigation including an army reserve colleague.

Canberrans still await the outcome of the Operation Kingfisher inquiry from the ACT Integrity Commission. Kingfisher has been examining why the ACT government awarded the Campbell Primary School’s refurbishment to Lendlease when there was another cheaper bid that, it would appear, met the criteria of the tender. 

With the possibility of Deputy Chief Minister Yvette Berry being included in the report, it ought to have been tabled before the election. Hopefully 2025 will see much more action from the ACT Integrity Commission – even to clear the air on a range of issues.

This was a year when the ACT was able to celebrate the effectiveness of our electoral system. Many will not have approved of the outcome of the election. However, the outcome did reflect the views of people right across the ACT. 

Unfortunately, with the return of Labor, it is likely that rates will continue to increase, our Standard & Poor’s rating will remain stunted and support for light rail will continue. 

With a minority government installed we can now look forward to celebrating Christmas and looking forward to the New Year in the hope a government that is more accountable to the Assembly will deliver better outcomes for all Canberrans.

Michael Moore is a former member of the ACT Legislative Assembly and an independent minister for health. He has been a political columnist with “CityNews” since 2006.

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Michael Moore

Michael Moore

Share this

6 Responses to Here’s to better outcomes from the new Assembly

cbrapsycho says: 11 December 2024 at 2:49 pm

Let’s hope for better scrutiny and better transparency overall. Frustrating about the rates which have gotten ridiculous for apartment owners who also have to pay body corporate fees. For many, it’s cheaper to stay in their house than to downsize to a unit given the quarterly costs of each and the opportunities to extend houses for other purposes, unlike apartments. So of course there’s a shortage of houses for young families.

The ACT government loves developers building more units, as they take up little space, require less local government services and pay rates way above the service costs they incur, unlike houses. (Garbage removal from a complex of 100 units is much cheaper than garbage removal from 100 houses). No wonder Barr’s mob encourage building more apartments, as the revenue per square metre of land is much better, with fewer council maintenance costs and virtually no infrastructure development as more is squeezed out of what already exists (or it’s down-graded like the bus network) and it’s not upgraded unless you live in the inner north.

Reply
Jim says: 11 December 2024 at 3:59 pm

Ignoring the revenue angle – there are strong reasons for encouraging more urban infill and more apartments in our city. The rates issue is a joke and should be rectified – but that shouldn’t be a reason to build urban sprawl forever in a day. But it needs to be done properly – not the haphazard nonsense of this current government. This includes such as ensuring genuine choice and availability of a range of apartments, not just shoebox 1 bedroom apartments. While many may not think it, many young families are perfectly happy to raise families in apartments – but even that option is very hard to find in Canberra, where 3 or 4 bedroom apartments are as rare as hens teeth, especially in newer builds.

Reply
Jim says: 11 December 2024 at 4:02 pm

“Support for light rail will continue”

You can hate on light rail all you want, and debate its merits. But it is about time that the tired arguments around it are framed with the fact that, on multiple occasions, the opposition has run with an anti-tram campaign, and lost every time. While many are concerned around costs, I think its a loud minority that bang on about the issue to any great length, that doesn’t necessarily reflect the wider community on the issue.

Put the torch on cost and delivery timeframes of it, but the argument of ‘to light rail or not to light rail’ is long dead, at least for the route through to Woden. Like it or lump it, it is going to happen.

Reply
John Bell says: 11 December 2024 at 9:31 pm

Labor and the Greens together got less than 50% of the vote, so they can hardly claim a mandate for tram 2B

Reply
BarelyGriffin says: 16 December 2024 at 8:51 pm

Labor and the Greens (who both support the light rail) have 56% of the Assembly seats after the voters distributed their preferences on from minor parties and independents who missed out during the count. The whole concept of claiming a mandate is always somewhat fraught; however, it seems safe to say that if even if you could somehow claim from the above that as many as 44% opposed the light rail, 44% is clearly not a mandate to stop further light rail.

Reply
BarelyGriffin says: 16 December 2024 at 9:22 pm

Labor and the Greens, after voters’ preferences (remember they are not any party’s preferences) were distributed, have 56% of the seats. Mandates are always a fraught concept; however, it is hard to claim that at very maximum 44% (for the sake of argument) have a mandate to stop Stage 2B of the light rail.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews