News location:

Sunday, March 16, 2025 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

How ‘tradwives’ market a romanticised lifestyle

Why is being a tradwife growing in popularity in 2025, and how has it become so marketable?

With a ‘tradwife’ starring in Married at First Sight, a nostalgic vision of womanhood takes centre stage, says CHRISTINA VOGELS.

When Married at First Sight Australia bride Lauren Hall said her main goal was to “serve” her man, the reality show contestant was reflecting a growing trend in western culture – the so-called tradwife lifestyle.

Tradwives are women who choose to take up traditional gendered roles within the home, centred around serving their husband and children. This version of wifehood is underpinned by a deference to one’s husband.

Because of this, tradwives tend to be financially dependent on their husbands and many also give over decision-making rights to their husbands. In essence, the tradwife lifestyle rejects the past seven decades of feminism.

But why is being a tradwife growing in popularity in 2025, and how has it become so marketable?

The rise (or return) of tradwives

Social media is partly to blame. The tradwife trend has risen in visibility across platforms such as Instagram and TikTok.

Influencer Hannah Neeleman from Ballerina Farm is one of the most prolific tradwife influencers, topping 10-million followers on her Instagram page.

Other Instagram accounts such as Ekaterina Anderson and Aria Lewis are popular in their own right, with followers ranging from 100,000 to 200,000.

All promote a joy of domesticity. They post about their daily tasks of baking, preparing meals, raising children and, for many, connecting to the land and living sustainably.

However, underneath this joy of domesticity is often an advocation of subservience. Many tradwives openly promote the daily pleasure they get from serving their husbands, who they argue are the “natural” head of the household.

Marketing a romanticised lifestyle

Why, then, is this version of femininity so desirable?

For one, tradwives market a romanticised lifestyle. Theirs is reminiscent of the 1950s: a golden age economically, where employment was high, consumables were affordable and the male breadwinner was supported at home by a subservient wife.

The tradwife lifestyle also promotes a pioneering domesticity. Tradwife influencers often post about baking their own bread, make their own preserves and mending their family’s clothes.

Many also wear pioneering-type clothing – blouses and long skirts with the signature tradwife apron. A number of tradwives such as Aria Lewis also have their own clothing and merchandise lines for their followers to buy.

People’s need for “ontological security” (security of the self) – a term coined in 1984 by sociologist Anthony Giddens – is another reason why the tradwife lifestyle is followed by so many women today.

Broadly speaking, ontological security denotes a desire for a stable identity. Academics Catarina Kinnvall and Jennifer Mitzen offer this explanation:

“As the world is becoming more fragile, contentious, and conflictual, we are, Giddens argues, prone to seek a sense of security, a “protective cocoon”, in established norms and routines and in beliefs about particular narratives of home and secure pasts.”

The tradwife identity offers women this security: a stable, strictly defined and seemingly uncomplicated identity that is predicated solely on serving one’s husband and children. The nostalgia for the 1950s and the pioneering “return to basics” life feeds this sense of security.

“It is possible the tradwife identity offers women a version of femininity that provides safe haven from being shamed as ‘pariahs’ in society.”

A double entanglement

It also seems women are desiring the tradwife lifestyle due to the damaging effects of “double entanglement”.

Society constantly tells women they can “have it all”: sexual freedom, any career they desire and an ability to choose whether or not to become mothers.

In reality, however, this is an empty promise. Sexually assertive women, women who appear overly dominant in the workplace, and women who choose not to mother are often heavily shamed in society.

Herein lies the double-entanglement. Women are told they can choose how to live their lives but are then shamed for choosing ways of living that are actually seen as unfeminine.

It is possible the tradwife identity offers women a version of femininity that provides safe haven from being shamed as “pariahs” in society.

Sadly, though, there is no safe haven. When you strip away the romanticism of domesticity, the tradwife lifestyle only furthers the difficulties women face today by breeding a deep misogyny that is based on an intense subjugation of women.

The new female right

This misogyny is further entrenched by many tradwives’ association with the far-right women’s movement, which is gaining popularity within the US.

The BBC’s America’s New Female Right documentary explores the rise of this movement and how it further feeds into narratives that femininity ought to be based on submission to men.

It seems this version of womanhood will only gain momentum as the world veers even farther to the far right. The uncertainty of today – with frequent economic crises, climate emergencies and other crises of humanity – will only fuel the need for a nostalgic, seemingly simpler life.

On the surface, this is what many feel a traditional return to womanhood offers. But the costs of giving up the gains of feminism are not clear.The Conversation

Christina Vogels, Senior Lecturer, School of Communication Studies, Auckland University of Technology. Republished from The Conversation.

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

THE CONVERSATION

THE CONVERSATION

Share this

One Response to How ‘tradwives’ market a romanticised lifestyle

Incidental reader says: 7 March 2025 at 11:44 am

Tradwife movement is rebellion against woke culture, aggressive feminism and synthetic values. Paradoxically Tradwife movement is actually the form of feminist movement because woman have right to choose their traditional female, mother and wife’s role as much as they have right right to choose any other role.

The emphasis on career advancement, material possessions, and online connections has led to an epidemic of loneliness among middle-aged individuals. It’ s not just about having a successful job or accumulating wealth; what truly matters in life are human connections and family relationships.

Elderly people who have been forgotten by society despite their impressive careers highlight the need for personal attention and care in old age. Meanwhile, online “sexual freedom” is often nothing more than shallow interactions and a sense of emptiness.

The erosion of trust and relationship at work has also become a major issue. With the risk of sexual harassment claims or taking undue advantage always present, it’ s becoming increasingly difficult to form genuine connections with colleagues.

But what about family relationships? The cost of reporting minor disputes as “family violence” can be staggering. When seemingly trivial arguments are labelled as abuse, families are torn apart and long-term financial impacts ensue. Children may struggle due to the emotional trauma, while parents face increased legal fees and stress. Even if a case is eventually dismissed, the damage has already been done.

Family life is more complex than all inclusive honeymoon holiday. Happy family is tireless skilled job of both partners. Dropping the threshold and labelling routine family disputes as “family violence” offloads the responsibility for resolving conflicts away from the couple themselves. In reality both partners are responsible for their actions and words during disagreements, but today’s approach assumes a black-and-white trivialised view where one (often woman) is an innocent victim and another (often man) is a perpetrator. This oversimplification that a woman is an innocent victim and man is guilty unless proven otherwise neglects the complexity of human relationships and ignores the fact that both parties must share responsibility for their relationship. We are ignoring the nuances of human behaviour and creating a culture where couples feel forced to abandon their relationship rather than work through their issues.

I am against any violence. But I hear the tired narrative of “misogyny” and justifying family violence as soon as I start saying that in family disputes both parties are at fault. I am against a black and white approach where one party is always right and another is wrong based on their sex identification. I am against throwing out presumption of innocence. Family violence is not “win-lose” legal case. This is always “lose-lose”. If we want to resolve the problem we have to chose the lesser evil which inevitably involves trade-offs and working together through issues.

It’s time for society to reevaluate its priorities. Rather than chasing after material success or online validation, we should focus on building meaningful connections with others – at work, at home, strengthen families, and our communities.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews