News location:

Saturday, October 10, 2026 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Major study debunks cholesterol drug side-effect fears

Statins have long been blamed for medical conditions by those taking them to lower cholesterol.

By Aaron Bunch

Millions of Australians using drugs to combat bad cholesterol can rest easier after scientists dispelled common concerns over side effects.

Despite being highly effective at reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, statins have long been blamed for dozens of medical conditions by those taking them.

Drug manufacturers even list possible side effects on their statin packaging and websites, causing some patients to stop taking the life-saving drugs.

But a University of Sydney and Oxford Population Health study has found statins don’t cause most of the conditions often attributed to them, including memory loss, depression and erectile dysfunction.

“These are really important findings,” cardiologist Anthony Keech told AAP on Friday.

“These very common symptoms are often blamed on the statin, and it turns out that almost all of them are not due to the statin.”

The study of data from more than 30 million symptom reports from at least 150,000 people compared the results of those using statin therapies against a placebo (or dummy tablet) over about five years.

Researchers found statin therapy could not be linked to 62 of the 66 conditions often listed as a possible side effect by drug makers.

The incidence of symptoms was no different in patients taking the drug or the placebo.

The conditions included weight gain, nausea, fatigue or headache, excessive memory loss or dementia, depression, sleep disturbance, and erectile and sexual dysfunction.

“Whilst patients were commonly reporting symptoms when they came back to the clinic, it turns out they weren’t actually caused by the statin itself,” Professor Keech, director of cardiovascular research at the NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre in Sydney, said.

“It’s really important that people don’t get misled by things they read on the internet websites or in the product information.”

There was a small increase in risk (about 0.1 per cent) for liver blood test abnormalities; however, there was no increase in liver disease, such as hepatitis or liver failure, according to the data.

The results will put patients prescribed statins at ease and allow those experiencing symptoms previously attributed to the drug to investigate other potential causes.

“Knowing that statins don’t cause these symptoms will give the doctor and the patient an opportunity to find out other explanations … that might be easily treatable if the correct diagnosis is made,” Prof Keech said.

Previous work by the same researchers established that most muscle symptoms are not caused by statins and that statin therapy caused muscle symptoms in only one per cent of people during the first year of treatment with no excess thereafter.

The team has also shown that statins can cause a small increase in blood sugar levels, so people already at high risk might develop diabetes sooner.

Statins, which were discovered as a natural product produced by certain bacteria and fungi, lower cholesterol by reducing the liver’s ability to produce new cholesterol.

This, in turn, lowers the bad cholesterol levels that get stuck in the arteries, reducing the risk of more arterial blockages.

Commercially developed versions are prescribed by doctors to reduce the risk of a heart attack or stroke in patients who have already had one, and in people who have never had one but are at high risk of doing so.

News all day, every day at CityNews.com.au.

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Australian Associated Press

Australian Associated Press

Share this

3 Responses to Major study debunks cholesterol drug side-effect fears

cbrapsycho says: 6 February 2026 at 12:42 pm

This study cannot show cause as it is correlational, not causal.
It is cross-sectional, so compares different people rather than the same ones to see if those who use statins have different outcomes to those who do not. This sort of comparison does not show what caused anything, just that people who have used statins are different / or not to those who haven’t.
It does not test the same people before and after statin use to identify results of taking statins.
Statins may not cause these negative symptoms but this research does not prove this. It just shows a lack of evidence for causal relationships. Other research may go in any direction, so the full effect of statins is still not known.
Unfortunately for everyone, conducting research that can prove or disprove cause and effect is not simple for many things, in some cases being impossible due ethical concerns and risks to patients. Sometimes, we have to accept uncertainty considering all that is known and weighing up potential costs and benefits before deciding on action that is most likely to be more beneficial than costly. That must be an individual decision, preferably by well-informed patients and health professionals in collaboration.

Reply
Mick says: 7 February 2026 at 4:33 pm

Maybe those reporting on this article should talk to some of us that have had side effects to these drugs.
Never have I suffered from nausea until I started taking a statin for a period of 10months at such time time as I decided to stop taking them. My nausea stopped after a short period of time and am taking other alternatives to control my cholesterol , which appears to be working after my last blood tests

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*

Related Posts

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews