News location:

Friday, October 9, 2026 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Opposition pledges to restrict welfare for foreigners

Leader of the Opposition Angus Taylor says the coalition would cut welfare for non-citizens. Mick Tsikas/AAP PHOTOS

By Zac de Silva and Tess Ikonomou in Canberra

Australia would restrict the availability of welfare to foreigners should the coalition win the next federal election, under a plan that would also reduce the migrant intake in a bid to ease housing pressure.

Opposition Leader Angus Taylor will deliver his first budget reply speech on Thursday evening, unveiling a dramatic cut to the number of people allowed into the country.

Speaking ahead of his address, Mr Taylor said the coalition would claw back billions in savings by cutting welfare for non-citizens.

The National Disability Insurance Scheme would be for Australians only, and grandfathered for those already on it.

“We have got, right now, a government that is slashing support for private health insurance for older Australians, and at the same time dishing out billions and billions of dollars to people in this country who are not citizens for welfare,” he told reporters in Canberra.

“That’s not fair on hard-working Australian citizens. That’s not fair on people who have committed to this country for many years … and the simple principle is this, if you commit to this country, we’ll commit to you.”

Mr Taylor in his speech will say Australia should only bring in as many people as it can house.

“Under Labor, migration has run miles ahead of housing and that puts pressure on rents, house prices and on every young Australian trying to get ahead,” he will say.

Under Mr Taylor’s plan, a limit would be placed on net overseas migration, equivalent to the number of homes built in the previous year.

Net overseas migration is the difference between the number of people arriving in Australia and the number of departures, and also includes temporary migrants like foreign students.

Tuesday’s budget forecasts the figure at 295,000 for this financial year, dropping to 225,000 by 2027/28.

That’s well below the post-pandemic high of more than 550,000, when a flood of migrants re-entered the country as borders reopened, but still higher than pre-COVID levels.

Last financial year, around 175,000 new homes were built. If Mr Taylor’s policy were implemented, that would mean a cut to net migration of about 40 per cent for this financial year.

The opposition leader will also seek to challenge Pauline Hanson’s One Nation on migration after its win over the Liberals in the Farrer by-election, leaning into populist right-wing rhetoric around “mass migration”.

His budget reply speech sets up a fight with Labor over housing policy, after the federal government revealed plans to scrap tax concessions for property investors in a bid to help more young people buy a home.

Housing Minister Clare O’Neil has downplayed the impact of Labor’s proposed tax changes on rent prices, defending the move as fairness for first-home buyers.

“I’m not pretending everything is going to get fixed tomorrow or this weekend, but there will be a difference at auctions this weekend,” she told ABC TV.

“These changes will mean that there will be just a bit fewer investors at every auction, and that puts that younger person who is trying to get into their first home in a better position.”

The coalition has promised to repeal the changes if it wins the next election.

News all day, every day at CityNews.com.au.

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Share this

One Response to Opposition pledges to restrict welfare for foreigners

David says: 15 May 2026 at 8:20 am

And we reach an interesting position as a country.

One of hand we have a group of people who are used to getting rich, with the help of the tax payer, by taking advantage of the basic need to people to live someone. If you can out bid them for a place to live you know those people you just out bid are going to have to help you pay for what you’ve just taken from them and what they can’t cover the tax payer will help out.

On the other hand we have a group of people stuck in wage system, nurses, teachers, firemen, bus drivers etc etc, who cannot take advantage on the lucrative tax evasion of discretionary trusts. These things really do make people rich. However, these disadvantaged people have been able to tap into the tax payer funded wealth growth via negative gearing.

The problem with all this is, when someone gains there is usually someone who loses. In this case, it is the younger generation and those without rich parents who cannot get past the vital hurdle for wealth creation. The one’s who have lost their aspiration and whose ladder from previous generation is not negative gearing or tax dodge trusts. It’s the ability to avoid the rent trap of throwing money away on what are now oppressively high rents. The ones who are increasingly being locked out of the owner occupier market. As a country we need these people to get back into home ownership. The long view is, no point being rich if you’re too scared to step out your front door.

Whatever either side is proposing the fundamental thing is properties effectively need to be transferred out of investors hands out into owner occupiers hands. If you think supply will do this without changing the existing housing ownership then you need new houses being overwhelmingly bought by owner occupiers, they need to be able to out compete investors. If this isn’t going to happen in your solution then you need a mechanism that results in existing housing changing ownership. It’s not rocket science. When analyzing any solution you just need to put yourself in the shows of someone who has a good job but cannot see a way out of the rental spiral. Not the shoes of someone who has escaped that spiral worrying about how rich they can become.

Whatever happens I suspect when as a country we are going to go into a lot more debt. Many of the solutions seem to be, given that the problem is largely that we have a unfair access to taxpayer funded wealth creation and no one wants to give that up, to have the tax payer fund more peoples wealth creation. Maybe One Nation should spruik allowing everybody who receives any form of income to do that via a discretionary trust. i.e. let all the teachers and nurses and bus drivers etc be employed as a company who can distribute their income via a trust. It would just be levelling the playing field.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*

Related Posts

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews