Parton / Why Mr Fluffy will never go away

Share Canberra's trusted news:

WHEN Chief Minister Katy Gallagher stood alongside the Minister for Employment and the ACT, Eric Abetz, to make the major Mr Fluffy announcement there were those who believed we were about to hear the solution, but an all-encompassing solution is never going to be possible.

Mark Parton.
Mark Parton.
There are 1000-plus families involved in this. Although these loose asbestos fibres have drawn them all together, they’re all different. Their  houses are all different. Their stories are all different. It’s impossible to construct a one-size-fits-all solution that’s going to please even half of them.

I was most disappointed with the Commonwealth’s contribution to this. They haven’t given much beyond kindly allowing us to borrow $1 billion dollars that we have to pay them back with interest.

Mr Fluffy asbestos went into these homes while the ACT was under Federal control. Irrespective of any legal waivers that have been signed, I think there is a moral responsibility for the Feds to put a lot more skin in this game.

I put that to Senator Abetz. He smiled his polite smile and explained all of the legalities away. He assured me that if the ACT had been inundated by floodwaters that forced the demolition of 1000 homes, the Commonwealth response would be exactly the same. We all know it wouldn’t be.

Abetz knew that Gallagher was under enormous pressure to announce a “solution” and that, as a consequence, she’d accept the loan offer. She had no choice. I’m annoyed with the Feds. Many Fluffy owners are annoyed with the local government.

Mike has lived in his “Mr Fluffy home” in Kambah for 12 years. He called my radio program. How does he feel?

“Appalled, disgusted and let down,” he said. “Nothing good is coming out of this for me and my family.”

A number of houses on Mike’s street were razed by the 2003 bushfires. He now wishes that theirs had gone up in smoke, too.

“If it had burnt down, we could have just rebuilt and we’d be fine,” he said.

Matt now lives in Dunlop. He grew up in a “Fluffy home”. His father has mesothelioma. Did the house cause it?

“How would we ever know?” Matt asked when I spoke to him last week. “He worked as a motor mechanic for many years so he could have been exposed in a number of ways.”

Despite leaving the offending residence years ago, Matt feels bitter and helpless.

And Steve from Pearce doesn’t want to leave his home.

“We like it here. It’s been our home since 1967,” he said. “They’re going to have to drag me out kicking and screaming”

I think we’re a long way from being done here, folks.

Who Can You Trust?

In a world beleaguered by spin and confused messages, there's never been more need for diverse, trustworthy, independent journalism in Canberra.

Who can you trust? Well, for more than 25 years, "CityNews" has proudly been an independent, free, family-owned news magazine, serving the national capital with quality, integrity and authority. Through our weekly magazine and daily through our digital platforms, we constantly and reliably deliver high-quality and diverse opinion, news, arts, socials and lifestyle columns.

If you trust our work online and believe in the power of independent voices, I encourage you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support will be invested back into our journalism so we can continue to provide a valuably different view of what's happening around you and keep citynews.com.au free.

Click here to make your donation and you will be supporting the future of journalism and media diversity in the ACT.

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Previous articleCanberra Confidential / In memory of Clarrie whatshisface
Next articleTapestry ‘coup’ for War Memorial
Mark Parton
Canberra Liberal MLA and former breakfast announcer on 2CC.

1 COMMENT

  1. The offer provided by the Chief Minister and the task force greatly disadvantages victims whose properties are greater than 800 sq mtrs which is the majority. The properties will be rezoned and offered back to the original owners at a far greater price than that paid on surrender. This is not the case for owners of smaller properties. However, due to the possible delay of up to 5 years they too may not be able to purchase their properties back. As a consequent the majority of victims will not be able to return to the properties.

    The “Preferred Way Forward” document recently distributed includes design principles, one of which is “provide a fair outcome for owners of affected homes”. Seems the last principle “minimise overall cost …” has taken precedence.

    What home Owners want:
    The Task Force and the Chief Minister to provide a fair resolution for ALL victims. Victims are NOT usually asked to contribute to the funding of compensation. While the current “solution” is suitable for a minority of people over 57% of people who participated in a recent survey said they wanted to stay at their current address and receive compensation to allow them to rebuild.

Leave a Reply