News location:

Sunday, September 27, 2026 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Blow to borrowers with about-face interest rate hike

Reserve Bank Building, London Circuit, Canberra
RBA governor Michele Bullock and her board have decided to lift the cash rate.

By Jacob Shteyman in Canberra

The Reserve Bank has delivered a blow to borrowers with an interest rate hike, becoming the first major central bank to go from cuts to rises after the post-covid inflation spike.

In a unanimous decision on Tuesday, the RBA’s monetary policy board lifted the cash rate by 25 basis points to 3.85 per cent.

The move was tipped by most economists and expected by financial markets, which attributed a three-quarter chance of a rate rise ahead of the decision, after inflation surged back above the central bank’s two to three per cent target band.

Labour force data and consumer spending were also above Reserve Bank forecasts, heightening fears the economy was running above capacity and contributing to inflationary pressures.

A wide range of data showed inflationary pressures picked up “materially” in the second half of 2025, the board said in its accompanying statement.

“While part of the pick-up in inflation is assessed to reflect temporary factors, it is evident that private demand is growing more quickly than expected, capacity pressures are greater than previously assessed and labour market conditions are a little tight,” it said.

“The board judged that inflation is likely to remain above target for some time and it was appropriate to increase the cash rate target.”

But the decision was a difficult one for the Reserve Bank after cutting interest rates as recently as August.

After bucking the trend of peer economies by intentionally keeping rates lower for longer to prevent a spike in unemployment, the RBA becomes the first major central bank to return to interest rate rises since the pandemic.

Some economists predicted it would prefer to wait for further data as recent monthly inflation data had been softening and strength in the Australian dollar would take some heat out of the economy.

Domain chief economist Nicola Powell said the hike would take some momentum out of the housing market as it reduced buyers’ borrowing power.

A borrower with a $600,000 mortgage would see their monthly repayments increase by about $90, assuming lenders pass on the increase in full.

Attention will turn to what tone RBA governor Michele Bullock strikes in her post-meeting press conference, with economists unsure about whether the hike will be followed by further rises.

In updated economic forecasts, central bank staff revised up their inflation assumptions, with core inflation expected to come in at 3.2 per cent by the end of 2026, up from a November prediction of 2.7 per cent.

The board said it would use upcoming data about the global economy, domestic demand, inflation and the labour market to guide future decisions.

Treasurer Jim Chalmers said the decision was widely expected, but that didn’t make it any easier for homeowners.

“This will be difficult news for millions of Australians with a mortgage and we understand the pressure that this will put on families and businesses,” he said.

Dr Chalmers was quick to point out the board statement did not mention government spending as a driver of inflation.

“It makes it very clear the pressure on inflation is coming from private demand,” he said.

But the Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry urged governments to cut spending to take pressure off interest rates.

“The extraordinary growth in government spending has been contributing to three serious problems for business – higher inflation, higher interest rates and pressure for future tax increases,” the chamber’s David Alexander said.

News all day, every day at CityNews.com.au.

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Australian Associated Press

Australian Associated Press

Share this

2 Responses to Blow to borrowers with about-face interest rate hike

David says: 4 February 2026 at 1:48 pm

Let’s have some perspective here, the RBA is responding, not delivering. Whatever the RBA does it will be bad for borrowers. If interest rates don’t go up but inflation does people with loans will find they have less money to pay their mortgage because everything else has gone up. Raising interest rates transfers the pain from everything else to the loan repayments. The important thing here is there is some control over interest rates while inflation can change rapidly. Think of how much of your budget is loan repayments and how much is everything else and what percentage change in everything else matches a 0.25 percentage point change in your home loan.

The really sad thing is how pathetic the journalists reporting this stuff are. The problem isn’t the RBA, it is the way our economy is structured and in this case, primarily how much people have to borrow to live somewhere. That’s live somewhere, not own a property to rent to someone else. Those elite property investors get to dip into the tax payer purse when interest rates go up.

We need a decent government who will make changes to address the housing crisis and there is no hope of them doing that without people, particularity journalists, pointing out how bad they are performing. Do journalists simply not understand or are they all property investors? The RBA RESPONDS to how the GOVENRMENT is running the economy.

Reply
David says: 5 February 2026 at 10:50 am

Come on Jacob, here’s your chance for some journalism. Chalmers suggesting they change the CGT tax break, nice little article explaining why he would choose this option. What do we know abut wealthy property investors ….. they have a motto of never sell property. It’s only the poorer ones who would actually have to sell. However, this isn’t hitting those struggling as some people suggest (it’s the only tax break struggling people get) because struggling people are either paying rent or paying off the house they live in. Chalmers has suggested this because it doesn’t actually change the game and will lock up more houses the people looking to buy someone to live might have had access to. You want to change the game you have to tax people for owning more than one home for the duration of owning that home. As bizarre as it may sound, and this is why we have a problem, taxing them isn’t about introducing a new tax, it’s about reducing a tax break they already get. Yes, we give tax breaks to people who are making home ownership/cost of living/inflation worse.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*

Related Posts

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews