News location:

Friday, October 9, 2026 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

Shoppers could pay more after Coles misconduct ruling

Analysts warn a landmark ruling against Coles could have unintended consequences for consumers. Joel Carrett/AAP PHOTOS

By Duncan Murray

Customers could end up paying more for longer, according to a consumer expert who says a landmark ruling against Coles will have unintended consequences.

The Federal Court found on Thursday several products marketed under Coles’ “Down Down” campaign were not held at a higher price long enough to constitute a genuine discount.

For example, a party pack of Arnott’s Barbecue Shapes was sold at $4.50 for almost a year, before the price was raised to $5.50 for less than a month and then marketed at the “Down Down” price of $5.

Justice Michael O’Bryan ruled products would have had to remain at the higher price for at least 12 weeks for the discounts to have been considered genuine.

Queensland University of Technology retail expert Gary Mortimer said prices naturally increased with inflation and fuel overheads and retailers would have to wait longer before offering consumers a discounted price.

Professor Mortimer said Coles, and likely other retailers, would move to 12 weeks of stability before offering a discount, in line with Justice O’Bryan’s ruling.

“The decision does have some unintended consequences for prices and consumers,” he told AAP.

“If your favourite box of cereal goes up by 15 per cent next week, you can be assured it will be up at that price for at least 12 weeks before it can be put on a discount.”

An exception to the 12-week rule was a bag of dog food that retailed for $4 for 296 days, then $6 for just seven days, before being sold for $4.50 under a “Down Down” promotion.

The dog food was the one product of 14 under Justice O’Bryan’s consideration that he did not find misleading because it did not have a “was” price on the ticket for customers to compare to.

Addressing reporters after Thursday’s ruling, Australian Competition and Consumer Commission chair Gina Cass-Gottlieb said retailers could present a genuine “was” price, rather than a briefly inflated one, for customers to compare with a discount.

Labor MP Andrew Leigh said the case had confirmed a basic principle.

“A discount should mean a real saving, not a pricing trick,” he said.

“Shoppers should be able to trust the ticket on the shelf, without needing a spreadsheet at the checkout.”

Consumer advocacy group Choice campaigns director Andy Kelly said cost-of-living pressures made it more important than ever for customers to be able to trust promotions reflected genuine discounts.

“Hiking prices whilst telling consumers that prices are down has allowed Coles to have its cake and eat it too,” he said.

News all day, every day at CityNews.com.au.

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Share this

2 Responses to Shoppers could pay more after Coles misconduct ruling

cbrapsycho says: 15 May 2026 at 10:30 am

Why anyone would believe what a retailer says about its products and prices is beyond me. They are not in business for the welfare of consumers but to make a profit by whichever means suits their purposes.

People who watch prices and who regularly buy particular products knew what was happening, whether it be artificial price rises and drops, shrinking package sizes and spruiking better prices. We knew when to buy and not to buy, to get the best deal of an industry that is all about profit for them.

What needs to be watched and regulated better is truth in advertising, so that people are not sucked in by deception and lies.

The other area that is not well managed is the collaboration within the industry, where different retailers put their prices up at the same time (often by the same amount) and discount at the same time, so there is no effective competition in pricing for consumers to be able to choose the best deal.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*

Related Posts

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews