News location:

Monday, September 28, 2026 | Digital Edition | Crossword & Sudoku

From a memorial to the fallen to a sideshow for recruits

The Australian War Memorial… no doubt they’ll draw crowds of little boys. Photo: Elizabeth Kovacs.

“Do we really have to trash the AWM to get a few more hands on the levers of destruction on the way to Gaza for all? Surely, it’s better served as a memorial to our victory over war itself,” writes columnist ROBERT MACKLIN.

The character of the Australian War Memorial is about to change from a memorial to the fallen, to a sideshow for recruits. It doesn’t just normalise war as an appropriate human activity, but as a fulfilling career for the boys and girls of a new generation.

Robert Macklin.

I have no problem with recruiting commercials in the media. And if the government wants to present them as something other than a kill-or-be-killed operation, good luck to them. Defence technology is heading in the other direction entirely. The days of massed armies are long gone. Indeed, we might well be inventing the final enemy ourselves: called AI. 

Certainly, we’ve chosen to make the world as scary as possible through climate change. AI might come as a welcome stranger to take our place as the apex predator. But honestly, do we really have to trash the AWM to get a few more hands on the levers of destruction on the way to Gaza for all? Surely, it is better served to become a memorial to our victory over war itself.

I realise, of course, that I am one of the culprits in spreading stories that normalise, and even celebrate, our men of war. No fewer than eight of my books characterise the Australian “heroes” of war – 10 if you include the Aboriginal battle against the British invasion. Aside from the latter – which the AWM continues to ignore – they covered the period from Gallipoli to Afghanistan, beginning with the biography of Albert Jacka VC in 2006.

Already, I was concerned about the process. In an author’s note, I wrote: “The research of military literature exposed me to… an attitude towards death in war that I find deeply troubling.

“The premature, violent death of a single human being is a shocking tragedy. Often, it involves terrible agony. Always, it represents the loss of great human potential. Without exception, it causes the most devastating anguish and pain among those who loved the young man – for they are overwhelmingly young men – who is suddenly no more. One life is gone forever; other lives are scarred in ways that can never be repaired.

“Yet when we write of soldiers, we employ words like gallantry, honour and sacrifice to somehow justify the horror. And we speak, not of single deaths, but armies – millions – in a murderous obscenity. And we do so with a kind of fatalist calm that in itself is horrific. I do not excuse myself from the charge, though I have tried, wherever possible, to expose the enormity of the crime against humanity.”

I had in mind characters such as the World War I British generals Hamilton and Haig who, from the luxury of their suites far behind the lines, ordered the certain deaths of many thousands of young Australians. 

Thereafter I was forever prejudiced against the British class system – and its membership – from the rulers to the ruled who permitted it… and to its bunyip shadow.

World War II produced The Battle of Brisbane with my classmate Peter Thompson where only one man died, but at the hands of an American ally; thence to the Special Forces against the Japanese invaders; and more recently the SAS before the Ben Roberts-Smith scandal. 

They were not killers in their thousands; that was the fate of the civilians when we tagged along with the American military-industrial complex in Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan.

That leads us back to the AWM under the charge of the councillors and the director, Matt Anderson, who numbers a Duntroon graduation among his many academic achievements. They fitted a Black Hawk chopper in the showplace and decided to retain the Roberts-Smith uniform and weapons. Smart moves. No doubt they’ll draw crowds of little boys.

[email protected] 

  

News all day, every day at CityNews.com.au.

Who can be trusted?

In a world of spin and confusion, there’s never been a more important time to support independent journalism in Canberra.

If you trust our work online and want to enforce the power of independent voices, I invite you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support is invested back into our journalism to help keep citynews.com.au strong and free.

Become a supporter

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Robert Macklin

Robert Macklin

Share this

One Response to From a memorial to the fallen to a sideshow for recruits

Glenn Mathews says: 12 October 2025 at 8:22 am

This article is though provoking, and makes some good points albeit in the absence of the true purpose of the AWM. War is the extension of political influence (when words and economic pressure fails). The AWM is not meant to be a history of politics, it is a memorial to the victims of this political ‘game’, including those that lost their lives, those that survived and those that felt the repercussions.

To distill the AWM down to a little boy fantasy for recruitment is shameful and beneath you Peter. Having served in multiple theatre’s over the last 35 years, I do not glorify conflict, but I do recognise the sacrifice of millions to allow everyone (including the entitled amongst us) to live a better life.

Not all actions that have been undertaken by the military are palatable or perfect thus reflecting the imperfections of humanity, this does not give self serving journalists the right to broad brush the entire AWM.

Be brave and simply highlight the areas you feel are wrong, however you should also be balanced and highlight the areas that are right or have value. Sensational articles such as this one only serve as click bait and further divide our country. Try to be better – it’s what we as soldiers do everyday in serving our country.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*

Related Posts

Opinion

How smoking makes Australians poorer

Almost one in five Australians who smoke report going without essentials because of the cost. CORAL GARTNER and ARA CHO explain why cheaper cigarettes aren't necessarily the answer.

Follow us on Instagram @canberracitynews