Who is Canberra’s mysterious ‘secret prisoner’?

Share Canberra's trusted news:

The missing detail in the ‘secret’ prisoner scoop

Author ROBERT MACKLIN finds himself drawn into murky, security intrigue as Canberra’s “secret prisoner”, an Australian soldier stripped by the government of his real name, takes on the Alexander Maconochie Centre in court. Who is this man and what is his story? 

THERE is no end to the cost of war. The battlefield casualties grab the headlines, but so many of its crises take place behind the darkened shutters of our hospitals and, occasionally, our courtrooms.

Robert Macklin.

One occurred in Canberra’s Supreme Court 4 last Friday (November 8). The final blow to a human tragedy was dealt there shortly after 4pm. It was timed, I suspect, to avoid the prying eyes of the public and the media. 

I was there when a fellow Canberran (who for legal reasons I’ll call “Witness J”), a graduate of Duntroon, a former captain in Army Intelligence who fought with his unit in Afghanistan in 2011-2012, heard a judgement passed against him. 

His is a well-respected Yarralumla family. Members have occupied high office in Treasury and other public service posts. He was schooled in Canberra before graduating to Duntroon. He and his Indonesian fiancée plan to marry shortly after Christmas. 

The court was a clinical operation. Justice John Burns had heard the case in July when Witness J – at the time a secret prisoner in the Alexander Maconochie Centre (AMC) – brought a civil action against the AMC’s general manager, Ms Corinne Justason. 

It was triggered by his request to me – made through his brother – to visit him in the jail to advise him about the process of getting the book he had written published commercially.

The request came out of the blue, but it was not unusual. As the author of some 29 books, I often get asked for such advice, and I was certainly intrigued by this one. 

It was a memoir of his time in the AMC. It came with a synopsis and a first chapter, both of which were very engaging and well written. So I agreed and applied for permission from the jail authorities. This was granted but then, the day before the appointment, I was told it was revoked. When I asked why, the answer was silence. 

What I didn’t realise was that following my request, Ms Justason had alerted the AFP who then raided his brother’s Melbourne house and seized all copies of the manuscript he had sent him. In the prison, Witness J’s cell was also raided and his writings seized. His email access was also restricted.

He was outraged and though he had no formal legal training he conducted the case himself. An observer reported that he reminded her of Atticus Finch. 

I knew almost nothing of this. I was bemused by the silence, the more so when I learned that the earlier case that resulted in his incarceration had been conducted in secret as had his 15-month sentence in AMC. 

I raised the matter with friends whom I believed were well placed by their former and current positions in the Defence community to throw light on the matter. But they, too, were surprised. 

“This is not Nazi Germany,” they said. “We don’t have secret trials in Australia.” That’s what I thought, too. That’s what differentiates us from Egypt, China, Saudi Arabia, Russia, Iran and all the other tyrannies. 

But I saw anomalies that I found deeply disturbing. For example, the government had expunged Witness J’s real name from the public record and replaced it with the random alias “Alan Johns”. 

Even in last Friday’s judgement when he had served his 15-month sentence and was again a free man, Justice Burns addressed him as Mr Johns. And the case was anonymously listed as simply, “In the Matter of an Application”. To the courts, Witness J was and remains a non-person.

So, what lay at the base of this mystery? Is Australia really as open and just as we have been brought up to believe? Or has some combination of the war on terror, the provisions in the recent “security” legislation, coupled with a government’s endemic desire for secrecy taken us to the fringe of autocracy?

Ask our own Bernard Collaery or Witness K and I suspect they would be in little doubt. Witness J’s case is both different and similar. Like Witness K, when charged with his offence under the Intelligence Services Act 2001, he pleaded guilty. But unlike “K”, his actions were triggered by what he perceived as a personal affront to someone he loved.

However, had it not been for the 10 stressful years he had spent fighting for his country and seeing his fellow soldiers killed in the bloodied dust of Uruzgan Province, nor the next five after joining DFAT and postings to Iraq and other places, then I could easily guess that he would not have offended as apparently he did.

I have written three biographies of SAS operatives in “SAS Sniper”, “SAS Insider” and “Redback One” and the comprehensive history of our Special Forces and Intelligence Services in “Warrior Elite”, so I did not have to be told the real story behind his guilty plea. It is not part of the manuscript – “Here, There Are Dragons” – that he sent me and which I have now passed to my regular publisher on his behalf. 

That is an amazing story of a good man thrown into the company of the depraved. It’s an insight into the dark heart of humanity and a miracle of adaptation. 

But the real story behind it is one that demands to be told because it’s about a world that those of us who have not served in the front lines of our defences know nothing about, and where the stress of war and conflict become too hard to bear. 

I hope he tells it. It’s one that we all deserve to know as we count the cost.

robert@robertmacklin.com 

Letters / What is it, Minister, you don’t want us to know?

Who Can You Trust?

In a world beleaguered by spin and confused messages, there's never been more need for diverse, trustworthy, independent journalism in Canberra.

Who can you trust? Well, for more than 25 years, "CityNews" has proudly been an independent, free, family-owned news magazine, serving the national capital with quality, integrity and authority. Through our weekly magazine and daily through our digital platforms, we constantly and reliably deliver high-quality and diverse opinion, news, arts, socials and lifestyle columns.

If you trust our work online and believe in the power of independent voices, I encourage you to make a small contribution.

Every dollar of support will be invested back into our journalism so we can continue to provide a valuably different view of what's happening around you and keep citynews.com.au free.

Click here to make your donation and you will be supporting the future of journalism and media diversity in the ACT.

Thank you,

Ian Meikle, editor

Previous articleWharf Revue takes risks with ‘unredacted’ material
Next articleIndia accelerates on road to economic growth
Robert Macklin
Journalist and author. Contact robert@robertmacklin.com

5 COMMENTS

  1. Congratulations are due to Robert Macklin for writing this story. I had thought I had reached an age and a point in life at which I was beyond being shocked. I now know I am not.

    I find it very disturbing that the ACT Government has willingly partnered with the Commonwealth in the implementation of its draconian and authoritarian national security regime. The “secret prisoner” may very well have been serving a sentence for breaching Commonwealth law but the organs of the justice and correction systems that managed his trial and incarceration are administered by the ACT Government.

    It is ironic that the revelations contained in Robert’s article come at the height of the Right to Know Campaign, the catch cry of which is ” what don’t they want you to know”.

    In this case Robert reveals that the documents seized by ACT Corrective Services, under Minister for Corrective Services and leader of the ACT Greens Party, Mr Shane Rattenbury, because they clearly did not want them published, were related to a book which the “secret prisoner” was writing about his experiences and observations as a detainee at the AMC.

    A further irony about this particular act of suppression of freedom of expression is that it comes at a time, off the back of the Right to Know Campaign,when the Labor and Greens Parties, with the support of a range of progressive organisations such as Get Up are mercilessly, and appropriately, attacking the Liberal Government of Scott Morrison for suppressing freedom of the press and freedom of speech more generally.

    I for one will be very interested to see how Labor, the Greens and Get Up respond to the actions of the Leader of the ACT Greens and Minister for Corrections , Shane Rattenbury, for his decision to confiscate from a prisoner under his control a manuscript of a book about his experiences as a prisoner in the ACT, for arranging a police raid on the home of the prisoners brother to search for and confiscate any documents authored by the prisoner as well as refusing Robert Macklin, an esteemed author and writer, a right to visit the prisoner in the AMC.

    Exactly what is it, Minister, that you don’t want us to know?

    Jon Stanhope

  2. Thank you so much for this story. The world is becoming a terrifying place and citizens are afraid – I am afraid and afraid for my grandchildren. In their paranoia about secrecy, this government becomes more fascist daily. The people need to take back the government – they no longer work for us, they work for themselves and their own power. Please continue to be fearless in this kind of reporting.

Leave a Reply